People love Martin Amis; The Guardian's Nicola Barker drools over the ‘the withering coruscation of his writerly stare’ and declares that ‘Amis is the daddy’. The Telegraph's David Annand calls him ‘stylistically unmatched’, The New Statesman's Leo Robson describes him as ‘the most ambitious, seductive and, at 62, promising English novelist of his generation’, Tim Martin speaks of his ‘dazzling catwalk sentences’ and Olivia Cole proclaims ‘there really is only one Martin Amis and like it or not, we'll all be stealing from him for years to come’. There are times when this love is easy, when The Rachel Papers carries you away with its comic verve and its combination of elegance and insouciant filthiness, when Money takes your breath away with its exhaustively precise post-modern barrage of disposable degeneracy and its blistering sentences. Lionel Asbo is not one of those times.
Lionel Asbo is a book about two things, or really a book with two main characters; LIONEL ASBO and DISTON/LONDON/GREAT WORLD CITY. The life of the irredeemably thuggish Lionel and the life of the irredeemably grim Diston, the borough of London in which he lives, offer us a fish and a pond from which we are, according to the books subtitle, supposed to intuit things about the STATE OF ENGLAND. About the City Amis is razor-sharp; Diston ‘white as Belgravia’, ‘with its “foul-mouthed pitbulls, the screeching cats, the grimly milling pigeons’. It’s a place which lends itself easily to the kind of comic bathos that Amis has always excelled at; ‘To evoke the London borough of Diston, we turn to the poetry of Chaos: Each thing hostile/To every other thing: at every point/Hot fought cold, moist dry, soft hard, and the weightless/Resisted weight.’
The character of Lionel Asbo is altogether less piercing. A dog-wielding ‘extremely violent criminal’ who lives at ‘the very hairiest end of debt collection’ and ‘in certain lights and settings he resembled, some said, the England and Manchester United prodigy, striker Wayne Rooney’. Many reviewers have made the Dickens connection and noted that Lionel Asbo is awash with references to Dickens as well as to Tom Jones, Robinson Crusoe and the other classic social novels of the 18th century. According to David Annand this is ‘not only for his close reflection of the society around him. Dickens, he says, dresses up fairy tales in the clothes of social realism (Great Expectations has a wicked witch, Miss Havisham; an unobtainable princess, Estella; and an ogre who is transformed, Magwitch)’. The jacket of Lionel Asbo states that, like Dickens, it’s a modern fairy-tale, and it is perhaps for this reason that Lionel Asbo is such a jarringly preposterous character. For all his initial menace and illiterate lumbering he is neither a properly scary lowlife nor a believable human being, he's merely a bit weird.
Lionel’s fairy-tale begins when, whilst in prison, he wins the lottery. This allows him to leave the flat he shares with his nephew Desmond Pepperdine and embark upon a new hotel surfing, lobster-eating life, inaugurating him as a red-top mainstay and, later on, one half of a riff-raff celebrity couple. The relationship with Desmond is the crux of the novel. Desmond occupies a liminal social and moral space between the squalid milieu of his uncle Lionel and an upward mobility; he has university aspirations.
Desmond though, bears no imprint whatsoever of any of the cultural climates in which a young person might have lived in the last ten years. He writes letters to newspapers when he could post them online and hardly uses the internet at all. He has no friends, social networked or otherwise, and never emerges from the page with anything like a recognisable personality. His girlfriend Dawn is similarly translucent and teflon-coated, they talk about their money worries and they talk about Lionel and they have a baby and seem to exist for no other purpose than to do sensible things, in contrast to Lionel's stupid things. Their lives are desperately normal. The thin element of tension in their lives is provided by a sordid liaison between Desmond and his grandmother but it is so heavy-handedly trailed and draped over the story that the big unveiling is neither big nor revealing.
There is a hint of a gruesome grand guignol ending which may have been more interesting that the actual ending, but Amis doubles back and walks calmly away, into dull sentimentality. There is much about this book that is mystifying. Although Amis’s facility for luxuriant sentences is much in evidence, it seems that plot, character, insight, even simple research, is all left threadbare in favour of it. I didn't find Lionel Asbo very funny or offensive;in fact it's quite tame. If he wanted to be extreme he doesn’t go nearly far enough. There are, at several points in the book, a few tantalising seconds of some unspecified and unspeakable horror, not quite visible beyond a slamming door. These are the closest we get to truly spine-shivering moments, and they are unfortunately only hints of what might have been.
WHAT HAPPENS: Thug wins lottery in prison, becomes celebrity, learns nothing.
IN A WORD: Misfire.
WHY READ?: For the occasional verbal fireworks.
WHY NOT?: Paper-thin plot, piss-weak characters, out of touch satire.
Olivia Cole in GQ:
‘As combative and as vicious as ever, skewering the noughties as cruelly, as inventively and with as much screwy black comedy as he did in Money did the Eighties.’
‘Verbal hand grenade.’
Sameer Rahin in The Daily Telegraph:
‘Lionel Asbo is one of Amis’s best novels for years because he feels such a wicked affinity with his central character.’
‘Makes you laugh on nearly every page.’
Nicola Barker in The Guardian:
‘Amis is the daddy.’
‘Is this an offensive book? Hell, yes. Deeply. But then maybe modern England needs offending. Is this a readable book? It's a Big Mac made from filet mignon.’
‘It is every inch the novel that we all deserve. So let's give thanks that Martin Amis was bad enough and brave enough to write it.’
David Annand in The Daily Telegraph:
‘Stylistically unmatched.’
‘There are hints, too, of a new sensitivity.’
‘Incapable of writing an inelegant line.’
‘None of the ambition of Money or London Fields.’
‘A cheap, cloth-eared dig at the underclass.’
Leo Robson in The New Statesman:
‘A contentedly throwaway piece of work.’
Tim Martin in The Guardian:
‘Being this out of touch doesn’t bode well for what’s clearly intended as a state-of-the-nation novel.’
‘However grotesque and refracted; as it is, long stretches come off either as daft Little Britain cliché or as reactionary bluster.’
D.J. Taylor in The Independent:
‘Had me roaring with laughter.’
‘Martin Amis is one of those writers about whom it is increasingly difficult to find anything worth saying.’
Theo Tait in The Guardian:
‘Sentimentally incontinent’ ‘Lionel Asbo isn't a book that you'd press into someone's hands, like Money or The Rachel Papers.’
‘A thin comedy plot collides with dark, fevered visions, along with some deeply emotional, transparently autobiographical material.’
‘A clueless foray into popular culture and working-class life, conducted with Amis's trademark gaudy, repetitive insistence.’
‘A serious relapse.’
Emma Brockes in The Guardian:
‘With a few big exceptions – the New Yorker and the New York Review of Books have yet to pronounce – most of the US reviews for Lionel Asbo, Martin Amis's latest novel, are in. And they're not pretty.’