Hooo boy, this book is real trip. I thought it would be interesting to read about women who have large families and hear them talk about that choice, and it was. It was lovely reading a bunch of women talking about how great and enjoyable having kids is, particularly since I agree with them. But, to hear her talk, Pakaluk wouldn't believe that I agree with them, since she's pretty sure that people who don't have five or more children don't value their children as much as they value other things in their lives. She briefly mentions in the beginning that she's sorry to offend people with smaller families, but it's not so much that I felt offended, it's that I feel like her conclusions are just not true, and since she didn't interview anyone with less than five children (and herself has 14), she doesn't realize how off-base she is. I know women who have cheerfully given up careers and status in order to raise a single child, and I do not believe that the number of children you have is necessarily correlated to how much you value children. Pakaluk is big into biblical examples of mothers, but conspicuously never mentions a well-known biblical mother famous for having only one son.
Pakaluk is annoyingly confident that everyone can afford a pile of children, because, hey, you just need to shop at thrift stores, kids can share rooms...and did you know that kids don't really need a bunch of fancy lessons and sports? If your values are straight, you will find a way. There's some truth to this and my personal experience is that children don't have to be as expensive as is widely reported. Still, there's no way that having 6 children is essentially the same as having 3 because you already bought that minivan, and my sense is that Pakaluk, from her fancy tenured perch, just doesn't quite get it.
I genuinely loved reading these women talk about how great a new baby was for their teenagers and how much their many children love each other. Pakaluk is always so quick, however, to leap to the conclusion that this arrangement is absolutely best for everyone and the way it is supposed to be. If you have fewer children, they will be selfish, spoiled, and not close to each other. There's a lot of talk about God planning families, the implication being that if you leave the family planning up to God you'll get lots of kids, just the way you should. One of my great-grandmothers had 1 child, another had 3. Not everyone is going to have a bunch of children, and seeing it a sign of someone's deepest held values seems fraught, not to mention inaccurate. To make things worse (and more ridiculous), at one point Pakaluk even muses about how, really, girls need a sister and boys need a brother, moving beyond simply large-is-better to and also there's an ideal ratio of girls and boys to shoot for.
I agree with Pakaluk's pessimism that tax incentives, maternity leave, etc. will not significantly raise the birth rate; that seems pretty well-documented, though I would argue that perhaps it's a good thing to support families regardless of whether it makes them have more children. I agree that having large families if often a choice rooted in personal beliefs and desires and that the government isn't going to have much luck encouraging them to have more. She then pivots to some pretty scary stuff about how the solution to low birth rates is to basically make religious institutions more powerful and then really lost me by discussing how "public education is a government cartel designed to compete against religious schools" that "represents a drastic violation of religious liberty." Yikes stripes.
The interviews with the mothers in this books are interesting and many are really heartwarming. The conclusions drawn from these cherry-picked interviews, however, I could mostly have done without.