It seems this is going to be an unpopular stance, but this book bothered me intensely, and not in the way I think the author intended.
First, Dell is an awful, irredeemable human. I don't know why he referred to the lawyer's receptionist as "The Pig" unless he was basing that just on her physique, which is shitty and reflected poorly on his already dubious (at best) character. I don't care what kind of avenging angel he thought he was, but I found him wholly unlikable, untrustworthy, and morally bankrupt. Dell made many offensive judgments based on looks alone and came across like an obnoxious teenager in that way. Not the hero of any story I enjoy. He was the main sociopath in the story.
Second... I don't know how to emphasize this enough. A 14-year-old who has been sexually assaulted by multiple guys at once, possibly going back to the age of 12, even more possibly having survived things before that, who is exhibiting sociopathic, dissociative, and narcissistic behaviors is not the "slut" or "whore" or monster she was portrayed to be. She's a child. A very, very damaged child who did the best she could with the situation she was in, with no trustworthy adults or advocates she could count on, and it likely ruined her forever. A f'ing child! She was not the ultimate evil character in this story! Who exactly did she hurt or kill? Why did no one talk about Stockholm Syndrome? Why did no one get her any help? So very f'ed up! How on earth multiple adults, experts in their fields, could say without any shame, that the rape club and rape culture present in this town, started by the true villain who indoctrinated other villains into the "society", could somehow take one of the victims and make her the enemy, I will never understand. Yes, 14-year-olds can be sociopaths and do very damaging and destructive things. But how about we stop focusing on how this one little girl dealt with her trauma and focus on the vile guys who did it to her? Ridiculous.
Lastly, and this relates to both issues I have already stated, the girls in this book were referred to as ugly, fat, slutty, whoreish, stupid, evil, manipulative, and a pig... and that was by the people we're supposed to think of as the protagonists. The football player was called a "retard" by many people, but Dell defended him, and his character was greatly redeemed. The only other man in the book who was in any way insulted and called names was the prosecutor "Fat Face". The rapists and their gang had their actions described, but hardly any name-calling at all for them. No words like "manipulative" and "grooming" or "pedophiles" were used for these scumbags. They were all handsome and popular boys, then reduced only to their actions. Why such misogynistic slurs for the girls, some of whom were barely pubescent girls, many who had PTSD, and no post-trauma care at all? What is up with that, sir? Danielle supposedly had no conscience, yet Dell was a mercenary and a vigilante murderer calling her names. Get real. The man who adopted Dell as a child and taught him how to steal and commit crimes: "mentor". The man who showed him secrets of surviving and killing when training as a legionaire: "mentor". The barely pubescent girl who had been gang raped by multiple guys over and over: "slut", "sociopath", "evil", and "monster".
I'd heard good things about Andrew Vachss' books. I'd seen this book description and thought it could be really disturbingly interesting. If not for the rampant misogyny running all through this story, the victim-blaming, and the disparity between the way the girls and guys were judged, the plot was actually compelling. But I just can't with all the bullshit. It gets 2 stars because I read to the end and wanted to know the outcome. It loses 3 stars because everyone in this book sucked except the shooter, MaryLou, and her friend Franklin. Was that the point of the book? Was this supposed to piss people off? Was this supposed to make some kind of point about how 99% of the world's population sucks? Point made. No more books by him.