In this short lecture (roughly 25 small pages), Marion takes on what seems to be an obvious critique of his phenomenology: if "givenness" or even "pure givenness" is primary in phenomenology, then there can be no room for hermeneutics. Indeed, hermeneutics is set against givenness. Marion's response is nuanced and, for some, shocking: givenness does not mean that objects give themselves, but rather givenness is the condition of the possibility of hermeneutics and vice-versa. Givenness serves as the call to which hermeneutics responds - thus givenness is the initial plane on which hermeneutics can give meaning (from an already-experienced past out toward an as-yet undetermined future). Neither can exist without the other. Marion's analysis is penetrating and brilliantly solves this apparent difficulty for phenomenology, in turn perhaps bringing Husserl closer to Heidegger.
Read due to a tangential relevance to my graduate thesis.
This work is the written form of a lecture Marion had given as part of the Pere Marquette Lectures in Theology. What's really neat about this copy is that it is side-by-side english and french. It concerns the relation between Marion's phenomenology of givenness and the field of hermeneutics. It was a good, short read, tbh.