First impression: a useful, very clear primer on the physiological components and core mechanisms of trauma states and reactions.
All downhill from here.
We begin with a presentation of the steps of a trauma response – the Startle, the Stress, the Wall, the Freeze, and the Shutdown – and the hormonal cascades that accompany them. So far so good – this is pertinent, science-based, and very clearly explained to the lay reader; the transition from one step to the next is both intuitive and logical, and is relayed in terms that can be applied to virtually any traumatic experience. Powerlessness, overwhelm, the universality of trauma responses, the care and compassion we deserve from ourselves when going through a stressful experience – all is touched on with clear language and an empathetic yet rational tone.
Things started squeaking a little when mentions of polyvagal theory began popping up in Chapter 3. I initially felt that despite being a very shaky foundation for a purportedly scientific work, it seemed to serve the author well for the purpose of divulgation, but when she jumped from using Porges's concept of neuroception to convey the mechanisms through which the brain detects threats to adopting the ideas of ventral and dorsal vagal states wholesale, including the belief that one must imperatively work backwards through all the steps of a trauma response in order to arrive back to a balanced emotional state, things took a serious turn for the worse. (Calling a phrase "the polyvagal scientific term" for something, by the way, is nothing if not an oxymoron.)
To keep the woo-woo coming, Aipigian then decides to address adaptive and maladaptive coping mechanisms resulting from trauma through Richard Schwartz's Internal Family Systems framework, personifying our inner "protectors" and encouraging her victims to let these protectors know it's time to stand down. Just like the idea of neuroception, the concept of “parts” can be useful to illustrate some psychological and emotional reactions to trauma, and Aipigian does this effectively. But polyvagal theory and internal family systems theory are an ideological rather than scientific basis for the discussion of trauma, with a cultish and marketing-heavy lean to boot, which completely invalidates the very title of this work. Mentions of Aipigian's "Foundational Journey" trauma-processing program and the “essential sequence” she devised in every single chapter show that she fully adopted that sales-based approach as well, and much of the program – which is helpfully outlined in the entire second half of the book to give readers a preview of how they might reach healing – is kept vague enough to ensure that anyone interested in following the "essential sequence" will have to actually purchase her material.
Aipigian also addresses hyperarousal, which is a real symptom of trauma that affects people in a very recognizable way, but unfortunately decides to take the Somatic Experiencing route and call it "Global High-Intensity Activation"; as a result, if a reader decided to do a Google search on the term to delve into it more deeply, they'd fall straight down the woo-woo rabbit hole holding Aipigian by the hand instead of finding some legitimate psychological and psychiatric research.
The concept of a pre-existing filter through which we perceive every stressful experience – made up of the current state of our nervous system, our biology, programmed beliefs reinforced by our life experiences, and somatic memory – is interesting and potentially extremely helpful to an individual trying to understand the mechanisms behind their trauma. Unfortunately it's all wrapped up, once again, in polyvagal theory and talk of "neuroception". Fortunately, attachment styles and the early experiences that shape it are approached much more rationally, and although Aipigian can’t resist the impulse to throw in a little creativity with her presentation of these experiences as "attachment pains" (individually titled "hold me", "hear me", "see me" and "understand me"), her exploration of attunement, neurodevelopment, and biology as the three pillars of attachment is clearly explained and applicable (and her terminology does, admittedly, help readers visualize the root causes of attachment issues very clearly).
One thing Aipigian harps on a lot is the correlation between trauma and chronic disease/pain. While there is indeed a correlation, it is not proven to be a causative link in the case of all people with both a history of trauma and a chronic or autoimmune illness; in spite of this, Aipigian’s continuous insistence on this point often assumes a borderline dogmatic tone, making it sound like anyone with a chronic disease might have avoided decades of physical and psychological suffering if only they'd had the insight and strength to look within... there are much more delicate and, more importantly, nuanced ways to word this correlation, and this wasn't such a long book that Aipigian couldn't spare the wordcount. This insistence on correlation also involves some massive generalizations extrapolated from studies on very specific situations. Severe physical trauma involving multiple injuries or extensive burns, for instance, is known to significantly increase the production of reverse T3, which in turn reduces the levels of active T3. It takes a big leap to go from this to stating that trauma (of every kind) "often" causes this as well, resulting in thyroid illness symptoms like depression and weight gain. Conversely, anxiety and depression "without a clear cause" are supposedly a clear indicator of the presence of trauma. Ma'am - depression can exist regardless of trauma or thyroid hormone imbalances, and is an illness unto itself, real and diagnosable. Telling readers who already struggle with the feelings of helplessness and failure that come with trauma or with major depressive disorder that their depressive symptoms are really just a hormonal issue that you can fix by eating more salmon and taking a handful of supplements with every meal is counterproductive, if not downright dangerous; it will not make psychological and psychiatric symptoms go away, but it will make people feel like this is their own fault for not having a "healthy" (I'm very iffy on Aipigian's approach to this - more on that later) enough lifestyle.
And so we keep swinging between clearly explained, useful concepts and woo-woo dogma – from the creation of a felt sense of safety for body and mind to Internal Family Systems once again, from potentially helpful somatic release principles to supplementing till you have capsules coming out of your ears. If you go into "shutdown" regularly, your issue is "mitochondrial compromise", ergo you need magnesium malate glycinate and alpha-ketoglutarate, rhodiola, ubiquinol, CoQ10, pyrroloquinoline quinone, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, and IV nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide – not by yourself, of course, but rather working with a medical professional… or an "informed health coach".
A case study described by Aipigian, Elena, "started with brain inflammation support [with] magnesium L-threonate, luteolin, huperzine A, and 2000mg of N-acetylcysteine daily". For her attachment issues from childhood, she implemented... "five minutes of daily tummy-crawling". Yes, daily tummy-crawling sessions. (Feel free to implement that while reading this review - I'd be elated to contribute in this way to your trauma processing.) For, once again, "mitochondrial support", she implemented hyperbaric oxygen and red-light therapy, as well as removing "gluten, dairy, eggs, and almonds" from her diet... because "even without gluten sensitivity, she understood its impact on gut health and autoimmunity". Key words: “without gluten sensitivity” – despite the fact that there is literally no scientific evidence supporting the elimination of gluten as actively beneficial in these circumstances. Do we need to suck all the joy (i.e. sourdough bread, pancakes, scrambled eggs, and cheese) out of our lives in order to heal from a traumatic experience that did plenty of joy-sucking on its own? The real answer, reassuringly, is no. Aipigian is just not inclined to give you that, because her earnings from the Foundational Journey program would suffer.
Overall emotional and physical dysregulation, additionally, is according to Aipigian strongly influenced by "toxic burden", i.e. the accumulation in the body of molecules such as… mercury, from (wait for it) "dental work and years of tuna consumption", as well as "some vaccines" (which contain amounts of mercury so negligible as to be virtually nothing). As yet another bonus, why not make readers scared of fluoride in running water, which has been essential in reducing cavities and dental disease in the U.S. and worldwide, by highlighting its potential to be a neurotoxin without clarifying the concentration this would require? And what about chlorine - why not take a big ol' leap from "chlorine is a disinfectant" to "the chlorine in pool water destroys our gut bacteria" (if a reader is swallowing gallons of pool water during every swim session, perhaps a different kind of help is needed - either a psychologist or a swim instructor)? Let's also demonize parabens, some of the safest preservatives we have, highly regulated in terms of concentration in products that come in contact with the skin, and the least likely to cause adverse cutaneous reactions. Throw in “natural cleaning products” and drinking warm water with lemon every morning rather than dehydrating yourself with coffee (as if a cup of coffee could cause clinically significant dehydration) and you really, truly lose me.
The three biochemical imbalances that she presents as relevant to trauma responses - copper excess, pyroluria (resulting in low zinc and vitamin B6), and methylation issues - do indeed play a part in mood imbalances and even psychiatric disorders, but their relevance in the handling and treatment of trauma specifically is minimal (as a fun bonus, one of the symptoms presented for pyroluria is sensitivity to "radiation and electromagnetic fields"). But we’re not done – why not also take a detour into the management of gastric parasites and infections (purely because stress affects gut health and therefore makes them more likely), and make it both absurdly long-winded and maddeningly non-specific?
By the end of the book, we've delved into the whole spectrum of possible chemical imbalances, autoimmune conditions and other diseases that might give rise to both physical and psychologic/psychiatric symptoms reminiscent of fight, flight or freeze responses (truly, to Aipigian, absolutely anything could indicate the presence of "stored trauma" - at one point she mentions itchiness...), and completely forgotten we were here to talk about how to deal with trauma. To make everything worse, the entire book contains huge chunks of repeated material, with multiple paragraphs at the beginning of every chapter recapitulating the statements made in the previous one, which was rendered even more superfluous by the "Summary" section at the end of each chapter.
One single time, Aipigian decides to clarify that "nervous system patterns of stress and overwhelm" do not cause disease, but rather "[make] us more susceptible to them when we are exposed" (given that here she's talking about cancer as well as mold sensitivity or Lyme disease, presumably she means "exposed to any possible contributing factor to any of these conditions", since one isn't really exposed to cancer as one would be to a toxin or infection). This is great for her, as on a purely technical level it absolves her of the responsibility of having drawn a direct causal link between psychological/emotional trauma and physical illness; in reality, however, this one sentence is not what the average reader will take away from the book - the tone, alarmism, and general principles are what sticks.
We end on a good note – an encouraging, hopeful and research-based discussion on learned helplessness and re-expansion after healing from trauma (soured by a little more self-promotion – there’s even a list of health coaches recommended by Aipigian on her website! I’m stoked). The bibliography, if we ignore Porges and Schwartz being listed in every chapter, includes a surprising number of solid and interesting sources. Unfortunately, this is not enough to redeem this book. A work purporting to address the biology of trauma talking about "the emotional wisdom of holding on" and an absurd insistence on calling an emotionally balanced and regulated headspace as the "calm-alive state" would struggle to capture me to begin with, but Aipigian’s heavy reliance on completely unproven theories concocted by greedy egomaniacs drains even her more valuable insights of credibility, as does her insistence on all-natural, supplement-based approaches to health (not once does she discuss the fact that some of the neurotransmitter imbalances she mentions might most appropriately be treated with psychiatric medication, especially if they are severe enough to impair daily functioning).
The biology and physiology of trauma are fascinating to know, and can help people dealing with trauma understand their own reactions better and accept how slow, painful, and fluctuating the healing process can be. Aipigian did a great job with this part of her work. As for the rest, I'm not even sure what aggravated me more - the reliance on entirely unproven "science", the alarmist insistence on all-natural everything and demonization of every other element in the periodic table, or the maddeningly vehement claims of bidirectional causal links between trauma and physical health issues.