This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Its not great. The author is quite poor compared to both the preceding ones and little he says can counter the previous devastating takedown. Its also quite oddly constructed. He tries at first to keep his arguments in story for the first third then seems to give up and just describes an actual public debate between two characters. Its incredibly dry and uninteresting, before he just goes off the deep end for the finale.
I can see what he was trying to do at the end. It was an attempt to show how communism can accomplish great works for humanitry that the capitalist system can't. Which is true... no argument on that from me, you can get even more done if you use slave labour but that isn't an effective argument in its favour. Anyway, while as i say i understand what he was going for at the end its still pretty insane and doesn't really work.
Oh, i do recall a few interesting technological innovations described, that was really its only redeeming factor.