Pros: Gorgeous. really 4.6-4.7ish.
I started reading this book in a sandwich shop near my job and wanted it to be good. I know the author and while I had seen enough of her work to give me confidence that it'd be really good, sometimes you read individual poems you like only to get to the full-length and find all the singles were hot but the rest of the album ain't hittin'. After the first three poems, concluding with "candelabra with heads", the third poem, written in a form the poet calls obverse (an obverse?), I laughed out loud, too loud-and looked around, worried someone had noticed. As for the book, it was quite evident I needn't have worried-Ms. Sealey knows what she's doing.
The book starts w/ "medical history." The two opening and four closing lines:
I’ve been pregnant. I’ve had sex with a man
who’s had sex with men. I can’t sleep.
...
Uncle Ken, wise as he was, was hit
by a car as if to disprove whatever theory
toward which I write. And, I understand,
the stars in the sky are already dead.
One poem in and I'm invested.
A Violence
You hear the high-pitched yowls of strays
fighting for scraps tossed from a kitchen window.
They sound like children you might have had.
Had you wanted children. Had you a maternal bone,
you would wrench it from your belly and fling it
from your fire escape. As if it were the stubborn
shard now lodged in your wrist. No, you would hide it.
Yes, you would hide it inside a barren nesting doll
you’ve had since you were a child. Its smile
reminds you of your father, who does not smile.
Nor does he believe you are his. “You look just like
your mother,” he says, “who looks just like a fire
of suspicious origin.” A body, I’ve read, can sustain
its own sick burning, its own hell, for hours.
It’s the mind. It’s the mind that cannot.
(I too cannot w/those last 7 lines in particular. goodness.)
Follow these with "candelabra," which the poet describes as a poem in which "the...second half is written in the reverse order order of the first and the last line is the 'thesis question' of the poem." (I'm too lazy for this but I'm glad she's not:)
...
Can you see them hanging? Their shadow
is a crowd stripping the tree of souvenirs.
Skin shrinks and splits. The bodies weep
fat the color of yolk. Can you smell them
burning? Their perfume climbing
as wisteria would a trellis.
=
as wisteria would a trellis.
burning? Their perfume climbing
fat the color of yolk. can you smell them
Skin shrinks and splits. The bodies weep
is a crowd stripping the trees of souvenirs.
Can you see them hanging? Their shadow
...
Google the Thomas Hirschhorn sculpture from which she borrows the title. The poem concludes "Who can look at this and not see lynchings?", a question loaded by her identity and the collective unconscious of African-Americans. It serves as a demand to see, to look- it is an indictment of the extent to which the images too often fail to inspire in white Americans what it inspires in the speaker.)
From "Legendary":
O, were I whiter than white.
...All the amenities of white:
golf courses, guesthouses...
...Whatever else white
affords, I want...
Two of nothing is something, if they're white
...
All this before we get to the cento using lines from the work of 100 poets (#againtoolazy) and my favorite moment in the book, at "in defense of 'candelabra with heads," in which Sealey doubles back to insure she hasn't been such a poet the reader missed the lynchings in "Candelabra With Heads." Referencing another version of the poem which appeared in her chapbook, THE ANIMAL AFTER WHOM OTHER ANIMALS ARE NAMED, she writes
...
I ask, "Who can see this and not see lynchings?"
not because I don't trust you, dear reader,
or my own abilities. I ask because the imagination
would have us believe, much like faith, faith
the original "Candelabra" lacks, in things unseen.
You should know that human limbs burn
like branches and branches like human limbs.
...
A hundred years from now, October 9, 2116,
8:18 p.m., when all but the lucky are good
and dead, may someone happen upon the question
in question. May that lucky someone be black
and so far removed from the verb lynch that she be
dumbfounded by its meaning. May she then
call up Hirschhorn’s Candelabra with Heads.
May her imagination, not her memory, run wild.
She explains: “This poem was written in response to an editorial decision I made at the suggestion of poets whom I respect. In my chapbook, The Animal After Whom Other Animals Are Named, the edited version of the poem ‘Candelabra with Heads’ appears, sans the original last line: ‘Who can see this and not see lynchings?’ …the original ‘Candelabra with Heads’ speaks most honestly to my intent. That said, I’ve returned the line, the question to its place in the poem.”
While this moment from "in defense..." is perhaps my favorite moment-mainly because I just like the idea of making a poem of an aside/comment on one's own work, because it's traditionally transgressive to be self-conscious of what the effect of one's work may or may not be. She could not risk the reader not seeing the lynchings she sees when looking at artwork that isn't intended to bring them to mind.
If the preceding was my favorite moment in the book, the concluding poem is my favorite poem-I'm a huge fan of (good) like/love/infatuation/(tasteful) sexual poetry. From "object permanence", for the poet's husband, poet John Murrillo:
We wake as if surprised the other is still there,
each petting the sheet to be sure.
...Though we're not so self-
important as to think everything
has led to this, everything has led to this.
...
O, how we entertain the angels
with our brief animation. O,
how I'll miss you when we're dead.
-----------------------------
Cons: "the brief animation." "Beast" leaves you wanting about 10 more pages-there's so many great pieces the "merely" good pieces stand out in a way that they wouldn't in a book perhaps 10-12 pages longer. (To extend the record analogy, think of an EP w/one song you play less as opposed to the 15 track album w/2 skips. Or a book the length of the deservedly legendary CITIZEN by C. Rankine, where the importance and power on so many of the pages affords the luxury of there being less such effect on others.)
This is the best collection I've read this year. Highly recommended.