After reading this straight after the first boook in the series, Sister of Mine, I spent the first half of Let me Fly completely baffled about Rachel's change of attitude towards Henry. Her bitterness and understanding of the reality of life after slavery (that she would still face discrimination, and that societal attitudes wouldn't change immediately) is understandable and the author does a great job in bringing her anger about her ambitions being difficult to realise alive. However, I really hoped that Rachel would use her love for Henry as a driving force for change, or at least not care what society thought of them. Instead, her sending him away because he was unable to marry her seems arbitrary and a reason for her to develop another plot line that the author wanted for her instead. Rachel seems very frustrated throughout much of this book, trying an assortment of different things to create her happiness and only feeling content on the final page (and even then it's not quite clear what she decided). The author does a marvelous in creating Rachel. She just feels very human and complicated like anyone would.
I've read a lot of novels about the slave trade but few about the lives of slaves in the aftermath of its abolition. This novel offers a fresh perspective anout the first civil reconstruction for black people in America and she clearly has a lot of knowledge about slavery in the US and life after.
Strangely, Let me Fly would have been a much more enjoyable read about the aftermath of the American Civil War if I didn't read the first book, Sister of Mine. The change of the central characters' actions, particularly Rachel, was frustrating and I guess I just had a vision in mind of where I thought the narrative would go, but instead the story gets burdened with the other characters navigating through life post slavery, which I found a little drawn out at times. Rachel and Adelaide become too many different things to different people in order to presumably educate the reader about the struggles people faced post slavery. For example Rachel attempts to be a landowner, business owner, political assistant...As a result, I started to feel bogged down by political events at the halfway stage of the book and lost interest in Rachel's attempts to persuade black men to vote. From the halfway stage of the story, it starts to read more like a history lesson and loses the balance of melodrama which I like to be mixed in with historical events.
Given the way certain characters behaved in Sister of Mine, a number of things in this book just didn't make sense. Henry was always presented as kind hearted and selfless, yet was nowhere to be seen when his wife, lover and children were being targeted by the Klu Klux Klan. If Rachel forced Henry away because he couldn't marry her and Adelaide fell in love with someone else, wouldn't a speedy divorce settle that? Adelaide's and Rachel's love lives seemed unnecessarily drawn out. The ending does provide closure to this, although I did have to read it a few times as it isn't initially clear what Rachel actually decides to do.
I think Sister of Mine is a stronger story but I enjoyed following these characters as they rebuild their lives after slavery.