What do you think?
Rate this book


176 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1984
Jews were expected to suffer. To endure. It was a fate which had been meted out to them because of their recalcitrance in belief, their devotion to their own difference. Their suffering was at once governed by the white Christian world, and when it seemed excessive, then it was tempered by the white Christian conscience. Unless, of course, it got out of hand and what her teachers called a “madman” came to power and the “good” people didn't see that he had gone too far until it was too lateClare does not accept this, and her thoughts drift to the burnt bodies of the Jewish people and the Japanese people killed by nuclear weapons – she thinks of the dust of those bodies passing into other bodies and changing them. Thus the text insists on the persistence of embodiment: genocide and oppression cannot be explained away. Clare, dissatisfied, seeks further information and reassurance from her father, but he also engages in victim blaming and denial of responsibility
Well, we were trying to stop them, but it took time. And no one knew what was really happening. The Jews didn't even know. It was a terrible thing. But you know they brought it on themselves. They should have kept quiet. You can't antagonize someone like Hitler, you understand. The man was insane.Clare demands to know whether her father, himself, would have protected Jewish neighbours if he could, and is deeply disappointed by his non-answer. He concludes
I sometimes feel that Jews were put on this earth only to put people like me in difficult positionsClare's reaction to this distressing conversation is to secretly research the history of the Jews in Europe, continuing to seek connections with her own heritage and experiences. Here, Michelle Cliff demonstrates both that oppression is rooted in ideas about whose lives matter, and that despite the specificity and heterogeneity of oppression, connections can always be made that strengthen awareness and foster solidarity. Clare's father continues to view her 'sympathy' for the Jews as a bizarre aberration, but he remembers it, and dismisses its importance, when considering how to punish her for an unexpected misdemeanor. This underlines his failure to see how depriving Clare of information with which to make sense of herself is detrimental to her.
[...] Miss Mattie would walk for nine miles whenever there was an election, all dressed in her church clothes—nine miles in the heat, wearing a long dress, straw hat, tied-up shoes and lisle stockings, to cast her vote for Alexander Bustamante, whether his name was on the ballot or not. She explained to her children that he was the man who had brougt the minimum wage to the workers of Jamaica and for that she would be eternally grateful. She did not mind his reputation as a womanizer, a man who liked to crack the heads of those who disagreed with him—who carried pearl-handled sex-shooters and was rumored not to think twice before using them. She remembered her hours and days and weeks in the canefields, her legs scored and sore and scarred from the razor-sharp thin green blades which grew perpendicular to the woody part of the cane—the source of sugar.
And so she walked to vote for Bustamante—for whom they named a hard flour-and-molassescake—Bustamante's Backbone. And whom the queen knighted in the late fifties.