What do you think?
Rate this book
384 pages, Hardcover
First published October 1, 1988
: this is obviously a bunch of convenience-driven tripe poorly contrived to set up explanations for other things in other works. The quick jumps to terminology used in the fantasy novels, the quick associations, the quick adoption of names and local herbs is all insanely silly. This takes place 2000 years before the fantasy novels. Let sophisticated people have their medicine instead of slathering a numbing herbal agent they found in the wild on their wounds first thing. Geesh.
The Problematic: Anne McCaffrey is an old white woman who grew up in another time and there is much that can be forgiven and taken in stride with that in mind but much that cannot. E.G., Sarah Telgar gives her prospective lover an aphrodisiac in hopes that it will get him to sleep with her. That sounds like rape to me.
I also don't see how, in this far-advanced sci-fi world where there is a strong attempt made to depict women as being strong and independent and capable and equal the author would allow so much of current-world bias to creep in. Women are still relegated to the homework, to the weaving, to the child rearing. One of the most competent women on the planet who shares a job with her partner as an equal, doing every bit as much as he does, is relegated to making sandwiches (by herself) for guests when they come over and is the person in charge of making food (all the time). She is also shoved into a role of traditional soft-spoken, tolerant, kind feminine while he gets to be angry, loud, indifferent. In fact, this piece is quite often unfair to men. Telgar and his story is misandric at best. But, like I said, another time.
Now that I have the complaints out of the way, let's talk about the themes.
This is one of a very niche little genre of lost-colony sci-fi prequels to fiction novels. There are a handful of books that are similar. Fall of Angels 40000 in Gehenna Darkover LandfallThe Warlock in Spite of Himself to name a few.
Only two other novels that I've read (Fall of Angels and Red Mars) takes the same approach as this one, using a prequel to show the colonists discovering their new world and building a home in it. Most of this genre focuses on the rediscovery. The colonist fiction I've read largely focuses on internal dissension (this does to a slight extent with the Avril arc, but it's such a tiny bit of the book you could accidentally skip a few pages and miss it), alien invasion (think Ender's Game, a strong subgenera focus (Red Planet Blues (this is not cute though, do not check it out), or the ever so daring and new space criminal at large subplot (Artemis) . So the premise is rare, and for good reason. It's ambitious and difficult to pull off a book that must, by nature, primarily be about world-building. This kind of book is about details, about creating a beautiful world that your reader can enjoy for the sake of the world itself. The better novels of this type have strong characters and emotional and sometimes morality driven subplots, but you have to love worldbuilding to love the book. McCaffrey drops the ball remarkably of course, and it's unfortunately not made of rubber. There's some world building here, but most of it heavily relies on an existing knowledge of the world and the setting. If you haven't read other Pern novels, this might be sorely lacking in description and setup.
Most novels of this kind also have considerable moral questions relating to loss of home, changing norms, changing scenarios, power plays, right and wrong, resource scarcity, etc. This has none of that. Somehow everyone magically sets up, farming is easy, everyone conveniently marries off and gets pregnant within a year, everything is cool except for a few rogue upstarts and some wild lizards that are conveniently pushed out of the way. This is obviously intended to set up an idyllic planet, perfect until thread came along, but again, it's less than believable and hardly engaging.
Also uhhh... that's the end of the themes. There are no sub themes, just a bit of side-romance, coming of age, and "here are dragons". That's it.
I still like the book. That's probably more about nostalgia and the fact that I really love this genre of book. But I probably wouldn't necessarily recommend that you read it.