April 9, 2022
Update. April 2022. A rant. Why has the title of the story been changed to a publication it was removed from? "I Sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter" by Isabel Fall is not a really important story, but what happened to Isabel Fall is. All the shit she suffered online, the Twitter campaigns etc, that made her check into a mental institution, for writing it, all the accusations of transphobia, that she was a right-wing, anti-trans reactionary is an important story.
What is wrong with reading the stories and views of a 'right-wing, anti-trans reactionary' (which she wasn't) anyway? Is it worse than that of a 'left-wing Marxist pro-trans activist'? Why can't the internet handle both? If Ayn Rand had been publishing now, would she have been cancelled? How are people ever to form their own opinions if only one side is ever allowed to be publicly voiced? But that's the thing with any communist philosphy, there are no two sides allowed, free speech is a tool of the 'right wing fascists'.
The author herself was transitioning so it was a unique point of view. It seems she may have reverted to her original male identity now. In any case, why is transgender positive or negative a forbidden topic, why should only one side of the story be acceptable? I don't like all this woke stuff that says I have to think like that too or at least pretend I do to avoid censure.
Did the librarian not think for one moment what effect their changing the story title to a magazine it was published in would have on people's bookshelves. No, of course they didn't. They were so consumed no doubt with their own cleverness at finding it in the magazine, the original source, and changing it. Do they go around changing all the Chekov etc short stories into the books they were originally published in? Hopefully not.
__________
I'm not going to comment or review the content of this short story only quote what happened to the author when it was published and why they had it withdrawn from publication (but not from the Internet Archive, you can read it here https://archive.is/oXDEt). I've rated it 3 star because it's quite well-written and even though it's outside my genre quite enjoyable.
Almost everyone was upset by the reaction to the Charlie Hebdo cartoon, everyone was going on about free speech that trying to suppress it and the violent reactions and the murders of the Charlie Hebdo staff, the murders in the Jewish supermarket, the violence around the world was totally unwarranted by a cartoon. Violence is not only physical it is not only murderous it is also mental and emotional and there were some in the trans community and their supporters who objected to this story to the extent of making the author self-harm and become suicidal and having to check into a psychiatric hospital
There are a lot of very hurtful books out there books justifying racial hatred and violence, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, misogyny sexual abuse of children etc. It is better they stand, and the books criticised in reviews, the authors too, but not in a threatening way, than there is censorship.
These Twitter campaigns can be vicious with design, the modern way of attacking people emotionally, intellectually ruining their career and sometimes putting them in fear of physical harm with threats of violence and death.
Without free speech there can be no democracy, without a democracy we have no say in who will make the laws and enforce them. In one book I read the author said that there can be no freedom for trans people under capitalism. All the Marxist-Leninist governments of the world without exception have no love for the LGBGT and trans communities. Outside of most of Europe and some of the Americas there is very little tolerance for these communities. Check it yourself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_ri.... So I don't see the old, mid 19thC failed philosophy of Marxism, which is always a dictatorship, being any solution to this or any other problem.
What is wrong with reading the stories and views of a 'right-wing, anti-trans reactionary' (which she wasn't) anyway? Is it worse than that of a 'left-wing Marxist pro-trans activist'? Why can't the internet handle both? If Ayn Rand had been publishing now, would she have been cancelled? How are people ever to form their own opinions if only one side is ever allowed to be publicly voiced? But that's the thing with any communist philosphy, there are no two sides allowed, free speech is a tool of the 'right wing fascists'.
The author herself was transitioning so it was a unique point of view. It seems she may have reverted to her original male identity now. In any case, why is transgender positive or negative a forbidden topic, why should only one side of the story be acceptable? I don't like all this woke stuff that says I have to think like that too or at least pretend I do to avoid censure.
Did the librarian not think for one moment what effect their changing the story title to a magazine it was published in would have on people's bookshelves. No, of course they didn't. They were so consumed no doubt with their own cleverness at finding it in the magazine, the original source, and changing it. Do they go around changing all the Chekov etc short stories into the books they were originally published in? Hopefully not.
__________
I'm not going to comment or review the content of this short story only quote what happened to the author when it was published and why they had it withdrawn from publication (but not from the Internet Archive, you can read it here https://archive.is/oXDEt). I've rated it 3 star because it's quite well-written and even though it's outside my genre quite enjoyable.
Almost everyone was upset by the reaction to the Charlie Hebdo cartoon, everyone was going on about free speech that trying to suppress it and the violent reactions and the murders of the Charlie Hebdo staff, the murders in the Jewish supermarket, the violence around the world was totally unwarranted by a cartoon. Violence is not only physical it is not only murderous it is also mental and emotional and there were some in the trans community and their supporters who objected to this story to the extent of making the author self-harm and become suicidal and having to check into a psychiatric hospital
As a result of the contentious debate about her story and the personal attacks made against her, Fall entered a psychiatric hospital because of suicidal ideation,[11] and withdrew other works with similar themes in the process of publication.[11] Being still early in the process of transition, she also decided to abandon that process, telling a journalist, "If other people want to put markings on my gender-sphere and decide what I am, fine, let them. It's not worth fighting".[11] She said that she was particularly struck by comments that she must be a man because "no woman would ever write in the way she did", which she said increased her gender dysphoria.[11] (Wikipedia, if you hadn't guessed!)The irony is that the author is herself trans, but that was not known to those who attacked her as she said she wasn't out yet.
There are a lot of very hurtful books out there books justifying racial hatred and violence, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, misogyny sexual abuse of children etc. It is better they stand, and the books criticised in reviews, the authors too, but not in a threatening way, than there is censorship.
These Twitter campaigns can be vicious with design, the modern way of attacking people emotionally, intellectually ruining their career and sometimes putting them in fear of physical harm with threats of violence and death.
Without free speech there can be no democracy, without a democracy we have no say in who will make the laws and enforce them. In one book I read the author said that there can be no freedom for trans people under capitalism. All the Marxist-Leninist governments of the world without exception have no love for the LGBGT and trans communities. Outside of most of Europe and some of the Americas there is very little tolerance for these communities. Check it yourself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_ri.... So I don't see the old, mid 19thC failed philosophy of Marxism, which is always a dictatorship, being any solution to this or any other problem.