I received a review copy of “Common Sense” in exchange for a fair review. Joel Greenblatt is an engaging writer. I enjoyed his “The Little Book That Beats The Market.” He explains financial concepts in an engaging way that doesn’t require knowledge of sophisticated math concepts and so I was intrigued about the title and thought that he would be discussing a more socially responsible way to invest. However, this book is only very, very peripherally related to investing. It is more a policy-oriented book about education, immigration and banking regulation.
I am not of the opinion that an expert in one area of knowledge can’t make a cogent and authoritative argument in other areas, so I was amenable to hearing his views. On education, he convincingly argues that public education is just as much about politics ( if not more) than being held accountable for overall excellence. He is a believer in public charter schools so that children who live in zip codes with high levels of poverty and a lower income tax base can achieve academic success.
He also argues for “alternative certification,” for students who don’t pursue the college route. He believes businesses could hire workers who have the necessary skills to be hired without a college degree by designing educational offerings that would demonstrate knowledge and understanding, This would be a good idea provided children are not “funneled” in this direction because of poor schools. Fix the root problem rather than design a work-around.
Greenblatt also champions the benefit of highly-skilled immigration from an economic perspective and courageously outlines the cost:benefit of immigration based on various educational levels. Fortunately, he doesn’t demean the noble history of the US in accepting immigrants who might not have an advanced education. Unfortunately, in the current political environment, I fear that any argument against immigration is one that loses nuance and is used to promote the most restrictive version of immigration possible and heightens an “us versus them” mentality that is not conducive to understanding and tolerance.
I think his perspectives on banking ( too lenient in my opinion) and allowing individual investments in Social Security (he cites Australia as a model) as part of a more robust retirement income replacement policy is fraught with too many unknowns and therefore risky, but he puts forth a sensible argument.
In conclusion, this book, based on the writer’s background, is misclassified as an “investing” book under the traditional definition of investing and investment, but it’s still a well-written book that looks to improve our current socioeconomic condition and can generate some civil discussion., which is no small thing.