"Risks"
If a plants roots are located between two environments, one with a constant low level of nutrients and one with varying levels, the plant will choose to proliferate more roots into the area with varying levels. The plant is gambling on being exposed - even intermittently- to sufficient levels of nutrients"
A plants entire advantage is being able to store nutrients and average things out over time. The plant doesn't know if the low level nutrients will stay stable forever. This isn't risk.
A few pages earlier
" it is not uncommon to find individuals from marginalized or first generation backgrounds shut out of local networks of knowledge on education or professional settings.... people not gaining access to the unofficial or unwritten rules that are passed by word of mouth from those in the know. But we can learn a great deal from the network based relationships plants form. They provide examples we can apply to building an sustaining personal, professional, and learning collaborations (such as community gardens, community based mentoring programs, and collaborative professional work)..."
Really? Plants never discriminate, compete, starve out other individuals? Since when are community gardens and collaborative professional work related to interspecies symbiosis except *hand wave* ~~cooperation.~~ How is that a lesson from plants at all.
In the introduction the author was trying to describe how plants have to change their form to match their environment. But was failing to capture how fascinating, radically strange, and magical it is that they do this. Imagine carving out your own body to reflect the seasons past, making decisions across decades about which year to produce thousands of seeds, cutting into the possibilities for the next decade of weather and cycles. What would that feel like? Because this author didn't put that in this book.
I didn't get past chapter 2, but it's not going to change later on and I've already heard these things about plants so it's not a great book for me.