What do you think?
Rate this book
384 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1924
Herman Melville wrote Billy Budd for a specific reason: to satirize the “justice” modern society imposes upon its subjects. In society there are often “zero tolerance” policies, which prohibit special cases and favoritism. Everyone knows that, ironically, whenever such a policy is enacted money can be safely bet on the protagonist incurring the wrath of the society for a crime misinterpreted or presence unluckily found. Melville uses all of these instances in Billy Budd, so the purpose is quite clear. Furthermore, a limited omniscient third-person narrator adds an element of insightful detail yet restricted backstory. For example, we know a whole lot more about Billy than we ever do Claggart. This was intentional, and builds on the purpose by upholding the myth (and sometimes unfortunate reality) of people shrouded in power and secrecy impacting the innocent lives of those beneath them.
The theme of Billy Budd is easy to pick out. Melville writes to imply a theme of the individual facing off against a society sworn to a higher level of moral authority. Intertwining this with a judges conflict of conscience, Melville stretches the reader; one must consider what he or she would do if put in the judges shoes. Captain Vere, in this case, represents the “Pontius Pilate” figure. Torn between a law he loves and probably amended to a conscience he cannot deny, Vere is the epitome of an ethical decision crisis. Only throwing more logs onto the fire, Melville also spends ample time portraying Billy’s general innocent nature, which further complicates the major conflicts found in the novel’s climax.
The style of Herman Melville’s Billy Budd is not unlike that of Moby Dick. Unlike Moby Dick, Billy Budd goes from start to finish quite nicely, in only 90 pages. Melville uses language that is descriptive and lush, narrating a story rather than persuading a point. The novella is quite short, with a plot developing and ending before one can realize it’s over. The narrator focuses a lot on describing the youthful namesake of the book, using little action paired with liberal amounts of description. Melville utilizes this flowing yet piecemeal paradox to entice the reader, making the small work seem infinite in effect. Key moments come and go, with the reader left to imagine the in-between parts.
I found the novella to be interesting and thought-provoking. This being my first Melville classic (I do know a little about Moby Dick), I went in with an optimistic vibe. His style is not for everyone. I, having read almost all of Tom Clancy’s novels, am no stranger to immense detail and complex plots. However, Melville’s application of such style is not for my taste. While I enjoyed the satire, as I always do with classics, as a whole I would not recommend it to a light reader. The subject matter, along with the hole of historical context left unfilled by a non-history buff, prevents a stronger recommendation. I would alter the amount of exposition, as it is arguably the longest piece of the entire plot structure. Melville should receive kudos for his inventive work, but its higher caliber existentially makes the ranking of Moby Dick above Billy Budd understandable.