Good stories and author, could be great if...
Oceanic is the third book of short stories I’ve read by Greg Egan—so clearly I like his work well enough. Still, he can be pretty clunky as a writer. I don’t mind that the characters are pretty flat and that relationships are crudely drawn, really, because this is a fiction of ideas first and foremost.
Still, these stories could be head and shoulders above what they are now if it weren’t for:
1. The poorly explained science concepts! I’m definitely not a hard sciences person, but I am interested in the topic and have read a lot of popular science. I more or less understand basic physics things including relativity, general and special, and certain very basic ideas in quantum physics. And I have read enough complicated-science-for-dummies type stuff to know that it’s possible to explain complex ideas in a way that I can grasp. Egan either lacks the motivation or the ability to do this well. I will say this: at some point I realized that you can enjoy his stories without understanding his long, pedantic, boring, and largely incomprehensible explanations of the science itself. So if you’re not into that stuff, just read it once, don’t torture yourself going back over it, you’ll enjoy the story without it.
2. He’s SUCH a materialist and Cartesian dualist. (Possibly even a Singularitarian? Shudder....) Like, not the kind that questions his own assumptions about the nature of consciousness either. Nor does he appear especially curious about newer directions in the philosophy of consciousness. (This book, Oceanic, is particularly immature in this regard, a la Kurzweil, though all of the books I’ve read by Egan feel very “godel escher bach”/“minds I”). He seems like a much smarter person than me, and I feel disappointed he isn’t exploring any of the truly subtler implications around universe simulation, the mind body continuum, etc. I guess this is partly tied up in the weakness described in point 1, above.
I would, though, recommend any of Egan’s story collections, if you’re interested in hard SF. He’s prolific, so even though there are clunkers here and there, his work is overall entertaining and thought-provoking. Perhaps it’s greedy to wish it was more than it is—I just feel like if he pushed himself more as a writer and balanced out his logical, science side with some education and personal development in the so-called “softer” stuff, he could produce work that we could actually call pretty great, rather than just entertaining.