Listening/reading a Jack Schwager book is like listening to a bunch of podcast episodes of a show, some useful information, but ultimately it’s unclear if you really should be paying for the “privilege”. This is not to say that the content isn’t enjoyable (or occasionally informative). Yet, when I purchase a book on finance or investing, I’m hoping to gain some kind of practical knowledge, and despite the age of these interviews (the *first* Gulf War is fresh in everyone’s minds), I think there is some value here (indirectly), in hearing how professional and successful traders navigated unexpected events, or handled losing (and winning) streaks to deliver consistent portfolio growth.
This is the third of Schwager’s series I’ve listened to/read, the first two being his first “Market Wizards” and “Hedge Fund Market Wizards''. I don’t recall the first book at all, it was so long ago (and may have to see if it makes sense to revisit it). “Hedge Fund Market Wizards” I read just under 2 years ago, and felt it was a bit of a mess. One thing that makes reading & retaining information easier is if there’s some kind of transparent pattern/well-defined narrative to the text. In a book like this, that may be challenging to achieve, given that the text is literally a collection of interviews of disparate peoples in the industry. I recall thinking the “Hedge Fund” text was challenging in this regard. That being said, Schager does organize his interviews by theme, so that confusion may come from the lack of work I’ve had in the industry.
This text is different, although similarly organized, I found the material here significantly easier to contextualize and understand, again probably because the topics here are “bread and butter” with respect to any trader, whether you engage in it professionally, academically, or in some retail capacity. Unlike the Hedge Fund wizards, I even got some interesting insights out of the text, the primary thing being that the contemporary debate between discretionary and system trading seems to be skewed way towards the discretionary among Schwagger’s gaggle, and there may be a simple explanation for this: namely they represent the extreme tail of performers, and the ‘tried and true’ advice often given to “ordinary folks” to have a well-defined system, that one abides to and maintains fidelity to with respect to triggers and execution is a system that will get you “80%” of the way there in terms of your potential net.
What I mean by this is that perhaps “systems” trading is good ‘up to a point’, and does deliver a net profit significantly higher than the mean. However, there may be a dramatic difference between the top performing systems-traders and the even the lower-performing elite discretionary ones, because even the ‘systems’/quantitative options traders Schwagger interviews admit to engaging in a fair amount of discretionary actions. One might argue that these people were discussing trading events 30+ years ago, with many of the “big events” discussed being how the various individuals traded the Gulf War, and the 87’ crash. Stll, there are some familiar names in here, including: Drukenmiller, Bill Lipschutz, and BIll Hull, who have done well for themselves in relatively modern times. Though Drukeniller sees me to have incorrectly called the latest Covid-recession, and I recall him having some alarmist (and overly negative) statements on the nature of that recession in the first few weeks of the event (but then again you can’t win them all).
There were a couple of traders I hadn’t heard of that were interesting here too, including Jeff Yass and William Ekhardt, who apparently studied mathematical logic at the PhD level prior to starting his trading career. Though again, an interesting observation made by all of these quants is that they had to adjust significantly their expectations that formalism would extract significant dividends in terms of predicting/modeling real-life behavior. In effect, their technical training was valuable, but only indirectly. In the case of Mark/Joe Ritchie, they weren't even formally trained, yet they apparently developed one of the most sophisticated options trading systems to that date, what they did have was a “technical intuition” (as contradictory as that may sound).
Overall, the book was an interesting read. I don’t know if I learned much from it, though I gained the “knowledge” or a reflection of some experiences on how the careers of these men (and one woman) so that itself is valuable for someone who may be engaged in amateur trading (or just interested in the field). I think this book mates well with a more formal text, or as an enrichment reading after training on technique or after a year or two of trading experience. Conditional recommend