Dorothy Sayers called William Roughead "the best showman who ever stood before the door of the chamber of horrors," and his true crime stories, written in the early 1900s, are among the glories of the genre. Displaying a meticulous command of evidence and unerring dramatic flair, Roughead brings to life some of the most notorious crimes and extraordinary trials of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century England and Scotland. Utterly engrossing, these accounts of pre-meditated mayhem and miscarried justice also cast a powerful light on the evil that human beings, and human institutions, find both tempting to contemplate and all too easy to do.
William Roughead was a well-known Scottish lawyer and amateur criminologist, as well as an editor and essayist on "matters criminous". He was the founding father of the modern "true crime" literary genre.
Have you watched “Alfred Hitchcock Presents” and discovered—although you enjoy the noir vignettes, tautly directed and sharply written—that its greatest pleasure comes from the persona of its Master of Ceremonies: an arch-cynic masquerading as an Edwardian throwback, a self-important, polysyllabic man whose measured diction and subtle ironies scarcely conceal his macabre delight in each detail of mayhem and murder?
If so, I think you will also enjoy these twelve “true crime” essays. I have always suspected—without a shred of evidence—that Hitchcock's persona was influenced greatly by the prose of William Roughead. At any rate, I am certain Hitchcock must have heard of him, for he was well-known on both sides of the Atlantic in the twenties and thirties, attracting many notable admirers, including Henry James, Dorothy Sayers, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Since I made the Hitchcock comparison, I think it fair to mention that the tone of Roughead is morally superior to that of Hitchcock. (I speak here of Hitch, snide Master of Ceremonies, not Alfred Hitchcock, consummate film director, poet of expiation and obsession.) Although he relishes the gory details, Roughead is no heartless cynic. He uses his irony in the service of moral outrage, and his prose is at its most powerful when he excoriates the incompetence of investigators, the venality of lawyers, the beastliness of the genuine sociopath.
A Scottish solicitor who preferred writing about law to practicing it, Roughead loved murder trials and attended—and wrote about—virtually every major Scottish murder trial for a period of sixty years. This substantial collection—more than five hundred pages—is a fine introduction to his work. It includes (in addition to an excellent forward by Luc Sante) “The Westport Murders,” his classic account of the crimes of body-snatchers Burke and Hare, as well as the accounts of a maid bludgeoned by her nasty old employer, various poisoned husbands, wives and lovers, two silenced robbery victims, plus the horrific accounts of one baby brother disposed of by razor and one devoted mother dispatched by gunshot--all described in Mr. Roughead's old-fashioned but effective prose.
Roughhead's style is best appreciated in context, but I here include three easily culled examples of the greater delights to be found within:
1. "This fine spirit, housed in a short stout tabernacle of flesh, triumphed over its unromantic casing to the beguilement of its female worshippers: the doctor, a fat little man with a charming manner, had a way with women." Before the colon, we see the doctor in the inflated way he saw himself; after the colon, the plain truth of the matter.
2. "When the stones, forty-two in number, were removed, in a cavity beneath the boulder was seen the dead body of a man." A sentence worthy of Vergil. The order of words follows precisely the order of occurrence and revelation.
3) "I defy a couple, living on the footing here described, of violent opposition and mutual distrust, not to afford their intimates a glimpse of the cat in the marital bag, nor wholly to stifle the cries of that indignant creature." I love the way he takes a moribund cliche like "let the cat out of the bag," revives it with the addition of the surprising adjective "marital," and concludes his sentence by further animating the cliche-cat with its "cries".
If you want a creepy summer read that removes you entirely from this world into the world of the aberrant side of the Victorian psyche, then this is your book. This book is a fascinating look into some highly sensational murders and trials that took place in Scotland and England in the 19th and early 20th centuries. It was written in the late 1920s by William Roughead, who was a lawyer and criminologist. To us, these murders are obscure. To the world of Victoria, these were the Lizzie Borden cases of the day! These are the murders you see in those magnetic and beautiful engravings on the covers of The Police Gazette and The Illustrated London News. Ones with captions like "She knelt in court and wept. 'All I want from them is the return of Helen's head!'" For example, teenager Constance Kent. Her mother went mad in her corsets and crinolines, and eventually died when Constance was a young teen. The father then married the charming and dependable governess (smoother transition, I daresay!) and they had a batch of precious children who were constantly compared to the first set of children. Not in a good way, either. The second family obviously was better loved. They even had nicer beds and sleeping arrangements.....Do we wonder that one of the new kiddies ends up in an outhouse with his throat slit?? Ahhh....the well bred Victorian family. Most of the families preferred the poison method, but there are a few "brain coshings" and implied lesbian lovers in this book, just so one doesn't get bored. The amazing part of the book is the bungling of evidence and the ad misercordium logic that is applied to these cases. It is truly bizarre. Be glad you live in the age where pigs can fly! :) The writing is slightly archaic, but it isn't too bad to get through. In my humble opinion this man is a great writer, for any age. Oh, and truly be careful: Mummy might strip her gears at any minute.....
This book appeals to my deeply-entrenched fascination with true crimes of the past, and was such a pleasure to read that its 560 pages just flew by in no time. Rarely does a book of nonfiction this large maintain my interest so intently, but for some reason, I hated having to put this one down. And it just goes to show that crime hasn't really changed over the centuries -- the prime motives of murder (sex and money) are timeless. Before I even get to the end here, let me just say that if you are at all interested in famous crimes from times gone by, especially from the UK, this is a book you should consider reading.
The author of this book is William Roughead (1870-1952) a lawyer in Scotland who was quite well known for his interest in the history of crime. He was a contributor to the Notable Scottish Trials and Notable British Trials series, friend to Henry James, and in one famous case of the era (that of Oscar Slater), he joined such notables as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in trying to get justice for what they considered to be a trumped-up case and an incorrect verdict that sentenced a man to death. Roughead does more than chronicle the cases in this book; at many junctures he injects his wit and sarcasm and tries to appeal to his readers' sense of justice in cases where the guilty walked away and the innocent were wrongly convicted. Using the official court documents of each case, he takes the reader through the commission of the crime (with all personalities involved), witness statements, the arrest and trial, and the aftermath. Roughead's version of true crime reporting is nothing at all like some of today's accounts that promise titillating tattle, you know, the ones with the catchy titles and lurid covers -- he offers facts, his opinions and manages to keep the reader interested throughout. As Luc Sante, who introduces this book, notes:
"He is relentlessly discursive, his asides convincingly sounding as if they are being whispered along a bench, and digressive too. But his sense of timing is superb: though he'll take the reader on a walk through the past or through the neighborhood, he will always be back in time for the crucial next question."
There are an even dozen cases in this book, all of which occurred in Scotland, some of which have been well publicized via books, television, and movies, including:
-The case of Madeleine Smith, who was tried for murder in 1857 after her secret lover had been poisoned. -The case of Burke and Hare, the two grave robbers who eventually resorted to murder to provide bodies to the medical school from 1827-1828 -The case of Constance Kent, the young girl whose father eventually married the governess and had a child with her; Constance confessed some years afterward to killing the boy in a most heinous manner -The case of Florence Bravo, a young newlywed whose husband died mysteriously from poisoning one night -The case of Oscar Slater, who was convicted of a brutal murder solely on the basis of a pawn ticket and mistaken identity
and some I'd not heard of before, including
-The case of Katherine Nairn in the 18th century, suspected of murdering her husband by poison -The case of Deacon Brodie in the 18th century, respected gentleman by day, burglar by night -The case of Jessie McLachlan, who was supposed to have killed one of the maids of the Fleming household, and laid the blame on the eldest member of the Fleming family -The case of Dr. Pritchard, whose wife and mother-in-law both died under very mysterious circumstances, probably at his hands -One of my favorite cases in this book, "The Arran Murder," in which two men on holiday climb up a mountain and only one comes down -An incredibly twisted case known here as "The Ardlamont Mystery," involving the mysterious shooting death of a young man and a rather slimy con man of sorts -The case of John Donald Merrett, who went off to a dance hall while his mother was dying of a shot to the head
Classic Crimes is a treasure trove of true crime and treachery, one of the best I've ever read. I found myself heading to the Internet on several occasions to see if there were other books, television dramas or movies based on any of these cases and threw a few into my Netflix queue and onto my Amazon wishlist. On the flip side of my praise for this book, however, the language throughout is a bit stilted and may turn many readers off. Again, by Luc Sante:
"You can open the book anywhere and light on a random sentence -- for instance, 'The secret marauder came and went without a trace, save for the empty till, the rifled scrutoire, or the displenished plate-chest that testified to his visitation...' The usages herein may often send the reader to the dictionary, sometimes even to the OED."
However, if you can get used to Roughhead's manner of speech, the cases themselves will provide you with hours of entertainment, if true crimes of the past are one of your interests.
William Roughead was a Scottish lawyer and true crime writer in the first half of the twentieth century. I should confess first of all that I find him compulsively readable, although he may not be to everybody's taste (profoundly influenced by Dickens, check). The twelve essays collected in this book discuss crimes from 1765 to 1926, ranging from the infamous, like Burke & Hare, to the utterly obscure, like Katharine Nairn or John Donald Merrett. I can see his influence quite strongly in Dorothy Sayers (it doesn't hurt that some of the cases he discusses are cases she clearly used as inspiration for her stories, like Madeleine Smith (Harriet is kind of an inversion of Smith in Strong Poison) and Dr. Pritchard (quite explicitly, in the opening of Unnatural Death)). In those cases where I have found more modern writers with better evidence (e.g., Summerscale's The Suspicions of Mr Whicher, Ruddick's Death at the Priory), Roughead is wrong wrong wrong, but I don't even care. I love him for his prose style, I love him for his cheerfully blatant partisanship, and I love him for the way he's trying, even when he's wrong, to piece together the story of what happened.
I have thus far resisted the urge to go to Amazon and just buy all the Roughead I can find, but it's a struggle.
There are a dozen murder mysteries and their resulting trials covered in this book. All took place in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries Scotland. What makes these real stories so unique is that all of them contain things almost unbelievable, from the behavior of the characters to the verdicts handed down. Justice is a hard-won battle and then as now it isn't won but lost and turned upside-down. Too many of these cases went the wrong way, but in its terribleness is a lot of fun reading. The author, William Roughead wrote in a somewhat archaic style for being written in the twentieth century. It feels more like early nineteenth-century prose, but I love that inflated style. Roughead was a friend of Henry James and corresponded with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle so it is no surprise that these real-life stories take on a very literary quality. I loved this book. I just there was more of it. Highly recommended.
A wonderfully engaging collection of commentary on Scottish murder crimes of the 18th and 19th century by the editor of Notable Trials, better known in the UK than in the US. A couple of the crimes here will be familiar to those knowing how the Deacon Brodie and Hare and Burke cases formed the background of Robert Louis Stevenson's Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The humor and attention given by Roughead is engrossing and habit forming. He will outline a series of suspicious behaviors and then comment, "Such accidents will happen in the best regulated families." A friend of Henry James, Roughead's work was a major influence on just about every classic mystery writer. Perfect reading if you are shut in and want a good-sized tome.
Enjoyable tales of what Orwell once called “our great period of murder,” Roughead’s book covers a gamut of crimes (all of them murder, often with some other crimes too) in Scotland. He does do with a dry wit and an eye for the facts, and isn’t shy of pointing out when people erred in their speeches or investigations. Sometimes it’s a little easy to get lost in the woods of particularly tricky crimes - I’m thinking of the Ardlamont murder - but overall it’s an enjoyable read, and I recommend it to true crime buffs.
A fun but uneven collection of Roughead’s writings about famous trials in Scotland in the late 1800s/early 1900s. It may be odd to describe true crime writing as “fun,” but this book all comes down to the joy of reading Roughead’s writing. He’s wry, he’s elegant, he’s erudite, he’s refined — he is, in short, an utter joy to read. Some of the chapters in the book are more engaging than others, and a couple (such as The Ardlamont Mystery), are a little too detailed and go on too long, which may be inevitable in a book of this length. Setting those aside, the cases are interesting, and the contemporary perspective is too — you can’t help thinking that if people were so shocked at these crimes, which pale in comparison to the horror and violence of daily news in current times, what would they think of living in 2022? — and maybe I’ve mentioned what a sheer delight Roughead is?
No one else comes close: William Roughead was and is the greatest true crime writer of them all. Combining a flowing prose style with an inimitable, pawky sense of humor, he remains the best and most sardonic stylist chronicling human depravity since, well, the authors of the Old Testament put down their styli. By birth a Scot, Roughead became a Writer to the Signet, a privileged position which allowed him to attend and chronicle in print the great murder trials of his era (1870-1952). His books are mostly and shamefully out of print but are well worth seeking in used book stores: both the commercial edtions and his volumes in the "Notable British Trials" series. Henry James was one of his many avid fans and even the briefest sample of his prose makes it obvious why true-crime enthusiasts consider him the Master. "Classic Crimes"(which contains chapters on Deacon Brodie, Burke and Hare, Madeleine Smith, Dr. Pritchard, William Palmer and other villainously vintage killers) is the best collection of his work in print and I would be remiss if I did not mention that I owe my introduction to the peerless Roughhead to Toni Morrison, who confessed her Roughead idolatry in a New York Times Book Review piece some quarter century ago. If you like his stuff you'll never be able to get enough of it. (Also worth tracking down are the works of Roughead's friend, American librarian Edmund Pearson, whose "Studies in Murder" is especially worth reading.) As Roughead so eloquently put it: "Murder has a magic of its own, its peculiar alchemy. Touched by that crimson wand, things base and sordid, things ugly and of ill report, are transformed into matters wondrous, weird and tragical. Dull streets become fraught with mystery, commonplace dwellings assume sinister aspects, everyone concerned, howsoever plain and ordinary, is invested with a new value and importance as the red light falls upon each."
So this was a lot of fun. A collection of true-crime essays, mostly from the 19th century, mostly taking place in Glasgow. Roughhead writes in a style which is at once erudite and readable, and anyone who enjoys outdated slang will have a field day here; I particularly enjoyed Swarfed, meaning fainted, and Kitchen Fee, referring to the ends of leftover food given away to the poor as charity. The crimes are morbid, cruel, and fascinating, lovers poisoning each other slowly with arsenic, the brutal murder of a brother by her half-sister, and Roughhead's discussion of the court cases these crimes give rise to, the frequent incompetence and occasional excellence of the investigators, the fearless disinterest of the accused, the brilliance of some or other lawyer, are a pleasure to read. Recommended if you have any interest in this sort of thing at all.
True crime stories from the Victorian and Edwardian era. Roughead is a bit florid in his descriptions--to say the least--but the best of these tell the story clearly, with only a modicum of side issues and purple passages. The last two are the best: Mrs. Merrett and her son, which is affecting, and the Oscar Slater story, the injustice of which is unbelievable; it would make a great movie. Worst are the ones where the personal reminiscences, worship of the lawyers and judges, and exhaustive tendencies get the better of him--my least favorite is the longest. Oh, and the creepy one where he and Henry James drool after a murderess. Ick.
Luc Sante's intro to the volume is terse and perceptive. Made me want to read his own stuff.
Like his friend and fellow amateur criminologist Edmund Pearson, Roughead brought an elegance, tastefulness, and humor to his analyses of even the most revolting crimes. Roughead's writing style was strictly out of the 18th century, which may put off some modern readers, but I find it charming. One so seldom sees this sort of literate, careful writing nowadays.
Although this particular book does not show any examples of this, Roughead occasionally moved away from the true-crime genre to write about Scottish literature, history, and odd characters from his country's past. They make for delightful reading.
fun and witty. full of scots and gossip. (you will learn a lot about scottish criminal procedure!) (and this is more interesting than it sounds. e. g. witnesses' statements are called PRECOGNITIONS. that is….poetic. the scottish jury can return three possible verdicts: guilty, not guilty, and NOT PROVEN. which really blew my mind. provincial american that i am.)
i enjoyed the hell out of this book but i really can't say why. it's just peculiar good writing. i am tempted here to make an analogy to single malt scotch.
If you're a true crime buff, you should check this one out. It's written in a sort of high Edwardian style that most of the true crime buffs among us won't expect -- we're used to Ann Rule going, "And he hated women. Truly hated women. He killed them. Killed them...dead" and so forth. So this is a refreshing change. Roughead's writing style is a lot of florid fun, probably even for people who aren't genre buffs.
nothing but a good time, if you are into ornate Scottish prose on 18th century crimes of passion or other kinds of retardation specific to celts in formal dress. My first tentative step into true crime, although it's a NYRB book so i can like, not worry about getting the stinkeye from literate people on the subway.
This book is a classic. Roughead wrote of famous (read infamous) crimes that took place in Scotland in the mid to late 19th Century. For those who love British true crime, this a must have reference volume. His coverage of Burke & Hare, the 'body snatchers' who worked the dark streets of Edinburgh is thrilling to read.
Some of the crimes in this collection are very familiar to me; I enjoyed the coverage of the Constance Kent case herein far more than that awful treatment of it by Summerscale. The number of excellent reads I owe Dorothy L Sayers...
May be old-fashioned writing, but to me it's just someone who likes to hear himself talk. No pictures, just millions of words, i.e., "the incidents to which I refer . . . " Should have been edited for chaff.