While reading about Shakesperean interpretation throughout the ages, I was again in tune only with the Romantics, in that they were the only ones to discuss aesthetic principles rather than fanatically stick to their ideologies. Shakespeare, to me, should not be liable to the concept of ideology, for that limits his scope.
The book itself was not spectacular, especially when it comes to presenting information with no further explanation as to the information thus given. The illustrations are a plus, but no amount of drawings can suffice for the lacklustre performance.
Shakespeare will forever remain an enigma, therefore all manner of biographical inquiry becomes irrelevant, especially when you consider the endless speculation regarding Shakespeare - the person.
Humanity simply cannot comprehend that a man, albeit an "untutor'd" one can write such poetry. I still conclude that if a person wants to read Shakespeare, he must, for Shakespeare is self-effaced and all-encompassing, and one would not only understand the Bard but shall understand himself better.