Harlan Ellison was one of the first writers to inspire me when I was very young. I have no recollection of how I discovered his writing. In the early 1970s I was an adolescent horror film aficionado who frequented fan conventions, mostly to get movie posters. Often Horror gets lumped along with Sci Fi (a genre to which I was not averse) and Ellison is frequently present at such conventions, so perhaps that’s how he came into my youthful radar. This later collection, much like his earlier collections, features an angry, ranty introduction that’s better than most of the stories. And, yeah, that’s what the youthful me liked most, I guess, about reading Ellison, the ranty angry young man in whose ideas and rage I saw myself reflected. No, not much has changed on that score.
Angry Candy probably marks the tail end of Harlan’s heyday, although Ellison’s chosen form, the short story--and the demands of a market and economic situation for the continual churning out of such stories in order to come even close to surviving in the capitalist nightmare as a writer--has always marked him as an author whose productions are perforce rather up and down. At his best, Harlan is a master of both the short form and the imaginative leap. At his worst he’s a tad didactic, a bit too obvious, condescending maybe, and the tale will feature some invented fantastic leap that comes off as silly rather than the perfect imaginative/surreal way to say something best said through a skewed, artistic manipulation of words rather than in the direct, realistic mode. I guess his worst stories are merely a bit silly form the cynical perspective. Many people say that about sci fi in general, though. I have a friend who asks, “Can’t they find a way to tell me that same story without the silly costumes?” There’s the danger of the genre I guess, and maybe also its strength.
As for the collection itself, there are a handful of really wonderful stories. “Eidolons” was easily my favorite and quite a stand out, setting itself in a place where pulp sci fi and pretentious 1930s French surrealism meet and mingle pleasingly. “Laugh Track” was also amazing—more humor than horror, but also a touch macabre. (There’s a recording of Harlan reading this tale and it, like all of his recordings, is well worth seeking out as he’s an engaging and likable reader of his own material. There’s an old vinyl LP of “Repent, Harlequin, Said the Ticktock Man” and “Shatterday,” two of Ellison’s best stories, and no spoken word collection is complete without it.)
On the downside, Angry Candy is a long collection and a few of the stories—although none really bad—could have been omitted to raise the quality. (Remember how much better 40 min. LPs were than 60 min. CDs?—that’s why. Those three extra so-so tunes that would have been on the B-sides of the singles gummed up the gliding between one great tune and the next.) The illustrated and rather long “The Region Between,” for example, was best left to a small book of its own. But Ellison’s writing style here, like a wise old veteran by the 1980s, is always slick, concise, and often disarmingly beautiful in sentiment and phrasing. I like him better than any other sci fi writer—and that includes Bradbury, Bloch, Matheson, and Leiber, all favorites of my youth. (You’ve read them all on television, too, on The twilight Zone, Star Trek, and on , you just probably didn’t know it at the time.)