What do you think?
Rate this book
The Memory Chalet
The Memory Chalet is a memoir unlike any you have ever read before. Each essay charts some experience or remembrance of the past through the sieve of Tony Judt s prodigious mind. His youthful love of a particular London bus route evolves into a reflection on public civility and interwar urban planning. Memories of the 1968 student riots of Paris meander through the divergent sex politics of Europe, before concluding that his generation was a revolutionary generation, but missed the revolution. A series of road trips across America lead not just to an appreciation of American history, but to an eventual acquisition of citizenship. Foods and trains and long-lost smells all compete for Judt s attention; but for us, he has forged his reflections into an elegant arc of analysis. All as simply and beautifully arranged as a Swiss chalet—a reassuring refuge deep in the mountains of memory.
226 pages, Hardcover
First published November 11, 2010
148 people are currently reading
2842 people want to read
About the author
Tony Judt
56 books666 followersBorn in 1948, Tony Judt was raised in the East End of London by a mother whose parents had immigrated from Russia and a Belgian father who descended from a line of Lithuanian rabbis. Judt was educated at Emanuel School, before receiving a BA (1969) and PhD (1972) in history from the University of Cambridge.
Like many other Jewish parents living in postwar Europe, his mother and father were secular, but they sent him to Hebrew school and steeped him in the Yiddish culture of his grandparents, which Judt says he still thinks of wistfully. Urged on by his parents, Judt enthusiastically waded into the world of Israeli politics at age 15. He helped promote the migration of British Jews to Israel. In 1966, having won an exhibition to King's College Cambridge, he took a gap year and went to work on kibbutz Machanaim. When Nasser expelled UN troops from Sinai in 1967, and Israel mobilized for war, like many European Jews, he volunteered to replace kibbutz members who had been called up. During and in the aftermath of the Six-Day War, he worked as a driver and translator for the Israel Defense Forces.
But during the aftermath of the war, Judt's belief in the Zionist enterprise began to unravel. "I went with this idealistic fantasy of creating a socialist, communitarian country through work," Judt has said. The problem, he began to believe, was that this view was "remarkably unconscious of the people who had been kicked out of the country and were suffering in refugee camps to make this fantasy possible."
Career: King's College, Cambridge, England, fellow, 1972-78; University of California at Berkeley, assistant professor, 1978-80; St. Anne's College, Oxford University, Oxford, England, fellow, 1980-87; New York University, New York, NY, professor of history, 1987--, director of Remarque Institute, 1995--.
Awards: American Council of Learned Societies, fellow, 1980; British Academy Award for Research, 1984; Nuffield Foundation fellow, 1986; Guggenheim fellow, 1989; Pulitzer Prize in general nonfiction finalist, 2006, for Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945.
Like many other Jewish parents living in postwar Europe, his mother and father were secular, but they sent him to Hebrew school and steeped him in the Yiddish culture of his grandparents, which Judt says he still thinks of wistfully. Urged on by his parents, Judt enthusiastically waded into the world of Israeli politics at age 15. He helped promote the migration of British Jews to Israel. In 1966, having won an exhibition to King's College Cambridge, he took a gap year and went to work on kibbutz Machanaim. When Nasser expelled UN troops from Sinai in 1967, and Israel mobilized for war, like many European Jews, he volunteered to replace kibbutz members who had been called up. During and in the aftermath of the Six-Day War, he worked as a driver and translator for the Israel Defense Forces.
But during the aftermath of the war, Judt's belief in the Zionist enterprise began to unravel. "I went with this idealistic fantasy of creating a socialist, communitarian country through work," Judt has said. The problem, he began to believe, was that this view was "remarkably unconscious of the people who had been kicked out of the country and were suffering in refugee camps to make this fantasy possible."
Career: King's College, Cambridge, England, fellow, 1972-78; University of California at Berkeley, assistant professor, 1978-80; St. Anne's College, Oxford University, Oxford, England, fellow, 1980-87; New York University, New York, NY, professor of history, 1987--, director of Remarque Institute, 1995--.
Awards: American Council of Learned Societies, fellow, 1980; British Academy Award for Research, 1984; Nuffield Foundation fellow, 1986; Guggenheim fellow, 1989; Pulitzer Prize in general nonfiction finalist, 2006, for Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 307 reviews
August 27, 2011
This has to be one of the sadder books I’ve read. It’s not quite on the level of Memories of my Melancholy Whores , which I couldn’t even bear to finish, or quite the terror that 1984 was, and doesn’t have the anguish of End of the Affair. It was sad in a different way.
Tony Judt died last year of ALS, a degenerative disease that left him increasingly immobile- first just in fingers and toes, then entire arms and legs until he could not move at all. In the first essay of this collection, he matter-of-factly details what he goes through every day. During his daylight hours, he generally has someone to talk to, to dictate things to, he can be moved about more frequently, etc. But his problem is the nighttime- when he is put in his bed in one position that he can’t move from the entire night- not even a minor adjustment. The least uncomfortable position at the particular moment he goes to bed is the best he can hope for. So in order to distract himself, since he is, understandably, unable to sleep at night, he tries out the “memory palace” mental exercise from The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci. As might be implied by its name, what this involves is the mental construction of a memory “palace” that you can picture vividly and in detail in your head, with different routes through it and many different rooms. The idea is that you can attach a particular memory, or argument that you wish to make to a particular way through the palace, or put it in a series of drawers in a desk in your study, and remember it by the order in which you open them. It’s a cognitive exercise that allows for much higher retention rates in many people. It was a very effective method for Judt to pass his nights and remember what he had thought through the next morning.
Judt constructs a memory “chalet”, rather than a memory “palace” for himself. His "chalet" is a modest vacation spot in Switzerland he used to go with his family. A palace would have been far too much for a good social democrat like Judt. He makes quite a point of describing the small, completely unremarkable nature of this chalet, except that he remembers it in every detail over fifty years later. In order to construct his mental house, he starts at the foundation- his childhood, and dictates a series of essays that take us through his personal growth process until he reaches adulthood, and then has a further group of essays that discourse on varied topics that his background has given him strong opinions on.
It’s a sad project on a number of levels, most vividly because of his construction. In his chapter about the ALS, he talks extensively about all the things he has lost- his ability to do even the most basic things for himself, and how he has had to learn to do without everything except, really, his ability to think, and his ability to slowly and painfully articulate those thoughts. His life as an academic has, fortunately, been based a great deal on these skills, but he is nonetheless sharp about telling us that there is no happiness or no gift in his increased time to think, just a momentary escape, if that.
All of his essays about his life seem to be an attempt to reclaim the functioning human being that he was before the disease completely changed the way he lived every moment. In order to be able to connect to the person he once was, he starts with a chapter on the period he was born into, Austerity Britain just after the war. This chapter allows him to reconstruct his past into a helpful foundation that seems to give him more weapons to fight the disease. If he can convince himself that he has been doing without all his life, perhaps the things he lives through will be more bearable. Thus, the themes of “Austerity," his minimal needs, scrimping and saving, and feeling uncomfortable with luxury are found in nearly all the chapters afterwards. The dark side of this house he's building is that he doesn't seem to be able to understand the parts of his life that were not about this anymore. He is unsympathetic to any frivolity, anything that is bigger than it needed to be, anything flashy or anything fun. He is even impatient with any expressions of passion, need, or strong emotion. In one chapter that deals with his teenage dedication to the cause of Israel and the communist kibbutzes he lived on over several summers, and he dismisses his own passions as fundamentally ridiculous and concentrates instead on proving why he was right to leave the place and ultimately come to have a longstanding suspicion of both communism and Israel.
As he builds up his house from his childhood, it becomes tragically clear (at least to me) that he doesn’t seem to be able to remember feeling things, or else deliberately is shutting them out. Moral rectitude, incisive reasoning, sharp denunciations of nonsense, this is what he’s interested in. He wants to boil down to essentials, to get the most important stuff out because he knows that he hasn’t much time left, so it feels like he builds a narrative about “austerity,” that seeks to slowly show the reader what is left after the trifles are cleared away. He uses this to make wider points about socialism, social democracy, community, the purpose of the state, and what morality really means. With some striking exceptions (which I will discuss in a minute), you get the feeling like he feels like he has to hide any pleasure he once took in things that were not serious or essential or driven by clear ideas. When his family makes money, he's always careful to note that it wasn't too much, or temporary, or the fact that he didn't enjoy the fruits of it. When he describes his family’s European vacations, there’s a weird sort of pride in him about it, so to make up for it he has to emphasize over and over the small hotels they stayed in, the second class tickets they bought, how cheap things were in Europe, and his father’s continental heritage- like otherwise he might be a poor little rich boy we wouldn’t listen to. His father had a passion for cars, and he theorizes about what they meant to him, but he denies any similar feeling vehemently. It’s so… guilty, I guess would be the word. It also seems to completely flatten his life out in a way that doesn’t seem fair- but perhaps it is the only way he could understand it at the time. I don’t know, but its difficult not to psychoanalyze this mental exercise, which after all involves undertaking exactly the sort of diving into the past, discussions of parents, friends and lovers that a lot of psychiatry deals in.
Perhaps inevitably, it was some tiny little moments where some unexpected nostalgia, lushness, or longing broke through that were the most powerful for me. He describes the house where he grew up in London (his favorite one of the houses anyway- he hated the bigger house his parents moved to in the suburbs during a “brief interlude of prosperity”), and allows himself some lushness of description and idealization of the remnants of Victorian and Edwardian life that he finds there- the flower sellers, the last functioning stable in the city. He rigorously denies himself much nostalgia within his own life (except for morally acceptable objects that his socialist views would approve of), but he allows himself nostalgia for something he never knew, and an era he should be rights reject. He lets himself go much more towards the end in his more general, thematic essays, too. He allows himself a Victorian flourish in the chapter where he discusses how he ended up marrying his wife (which, beware, there are going to be a lot of women who won’t find his views in that chapter particularly palatable- it’s a whole thing about the negative, suspicious atmosphere that the fear of sexual harassment creates, and generally is one of those, ‘things used to be easier’ articles). It ends with a, “Reader: I married her.” His essay, “Edge People,” (which I love), romantically illustrates bygone cosmopolitan cities as he tries to articulate his own nostalgia for cultural markers, changes, and meetings, places where things were mixed, rather than cultures where boundaries seemed to disappear and melt because of all-embracing consumerism that makes everything look the same. (An earlier essay, about people who cross the Channel for merely economic purposes- to buy things, rather than to see things, which has made changing countries and areas much less visible, foreshadows this line of thought.)
My favorite, though, is his love of trains. He’s never made a secret of it, and he’s written several essays on it. His great work, Postwar opens with him at a train station. I’m actually surprised he didn’t construct a “memory train station,” rather than a chalet. Usually, though, he tries to make a point about state projects, faith in the state, infrastructure and jobs, etc. In this book, he finally looks at it in a way that seems to finally explain the root of it, and makes me understand, perhaps, why he’s been so strident about it all his life. It’s the passion that not even his disease could take from him, the one that seems to have become stronger, if anything. It seems to get at a core of something important about him that I’d never seen expressed before, something so sympathetic, so lovely, I can’t resist reproducing the passage in full here.:
“According to the literary theorist Rene Girard, we come to yearn for and eventually love those who are loved by others. I cannot confirm this from personal experience- I have a history of frustrated longings for objects and women who were palpably unavailable to me but of no particular interest to anyone else. But there is one sphere of my life in which implausibly, Girard’s theory of mimetic desire could be perfectly adapted to my experience: if by “mimetic” we mean mutuality and symmetry, rather than mimicry and contestation, I can vouch for the credibility of this proposition. I love trains, and they have always loved me back.
What does it mean to be loved by a train? Love, it seems to me, is that condition in which one is most contentedly oneself. If this sounds paradoxical, remember Rilke’s admonition: love consists in leaving the loved one space to be themselves while providing the security within which the self may flourish. As a child, I always felt uneasy and a little constrained around people, my family in particular. Solitude was bliss, but not easily obtained. Being always felt stressful- wherever I was there was something to do, someone to please, a duty to be completed, a role inadequately fulfilled: something amiss.Becoming, on the other hand, was relief. I was never so happy as when I was going somewhere on my own, and the longer it took to get there, the better. Walking was pleasurable, cycling enjoyable, bus journeys fun. But the train was very heaven.
I never bothered to explain this to parents or friends, and was thus constrained to feign objectives: places I wanted to go, people I wanted to see, things I needed to do. Lies, all of it… I took solitary tube trips around London from a very young age. If I had a goal, it was to cover the whole network, from terminus to terminus, an aspiration I came very close to achieving. What did I do when I reached the end of a line, Edgware as it might be, or Ongar? I stepped out, studied the station rather closely, glanced around me… and took the next tube back.
The technology, the architecture, and working practices of a railway system fascinated me from the outset-I can describe even today the peculiarities of the separate London Underground liens and their station layouts. But I was never a “trainspotter.” Even when I graduated to solitary travel on the extensive network of British Railways’ Southern Region I never joined the enthusiastic bands of anorak-clad preteenage boys at the end of the platforms, assiduously noting down the numbers of passing trains. This seemed to me the most asinine of static pursuits- the point of a train was to get on it.”
Out of the harshness, deprivation, austerity, and disillusion comes this wonderful paean to the one thing that his worldviews never necessitated that he abandon, that no amount of travel or time could get rid of. It becomes the essence of the things he has lost, and the memory that seems the true escape from his current condition.
I admit that I teared up when he came back to this, so fittingly, at the end. Even behind his comforting symbol of Right Thinking in Switzerland, was this pure, wonderful passion for trains that was his true home. His last paragraph reads:
“There is a path of sorts that accompanies, Murren’s pocket railway. Halfway along, a little café- the only stop on the line- serves the usual run of Swiss wayside fare. Ahead, the mountain falls steeply away into the rift valley below. Behind, you can clamber up to the summer barns with the cows and goats and shepherds. Or you can just wait for the next train: punctual, predictable and precise to the second. Nothing happens: it is the happiest place in the world. We cannot choose where we start out in life, but we may finish where we will. I know where I shall be: going nowhere in particular on that little train, forever and ever.”
I try not to indulge in too many fantasies of an uncertain afterlife, but I can’t help hoping that is exactly what he found. RIP, Professor Judt. You always knew what was important, and you helped me to see that, too. I wish I could have thanked you for that.
Tony Judt died last year of ALS, a degenerative disease that left him increasingly immobile- first just in fingers and toes, then entire arms and legs until he could not move at all. In the first essay of this collection, he matter-of-factly details what he goes through every day. During his daylight hours, he generally has someone to talk to, to dictate things to, he can be moved about more frequently, etc. But his problem is the nighttime- when he is put in his bed in one position that he can’t move from the entire night- not even a minor adjustment. The least uncomfortable position at the particular moment he goes to bed is the best he can hope for. So in order to distract himself, since he is, understandably, unable to sleep at night, he tries out the “memory palace” mental exercise from The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci. As might be implied by its name, what this involves is the mental construction of a memory “palace” that you can picture vividly and in detail in your head, with different routes through it and many different rooms. The idea is that you can attach a particular memory, or argument that you wish to make to a particular way through the palace, or put it in a series of drawers in a desk in your study, and remember it by the order in which you open them. It’s a cognitive exercise that allows for much higher retention rates in many people. It was a very effective method for Judt to pass his nights and remember what he had thought through the next morning.
Judt constructs a memory “chalet”, rather than a memory “palace” for himself. His "chalet" is a modest vacation spot in Switzerland he used to go with his family. A palace would have been far too much for a good social democrat like Judt. He makes quite a point of describing the small, completely unremarkable nature of this chalet, except that he remembers it in every detail over fifty years later. In order to construct his mental house, he starts at the foundation- his childhood, and dictates a series of essays that take us through his personal growth process until he reaches adulthood, and then has a further group of essays that discourse on varied topics that his background has given him strong opinions on.
It’s a sad project on a number of levels, most vividly because of his construction. In his chapter about the ALS, he talks extensively about all the things he has lost- his ability to do even the most basic things for himself, and how he has had to learn to do without everything except, really, his ability to think, and his ability to slowly and painfully articulate those thoughts. His life as an academic has, fortunately, been based a great deal on these skills, but he is nonetheless sharp about telling us that there is no happiness or no gift in his increased time to think, just a momentary escape, if that.
All of his essays about his life seem to be an attempt to reclaim the functioning human being that he was before the disease completely changed the way he lived every moment. In order to be able to connect to the person he once was, he starts with a chapter on the period he was born into, Austerity Britain just after the war. This chapter allows him to reconstruct his past into a helpful foundation that seems to give him more weapons to fight the disease. If he can convince himself that he has been doing without all his life, perhaps the things he lives through will be more bearable. Thus, the themes of “Austerity," his minimal needs, scrimping and saving, and feeling uncomfortable with luxury are found in nearly all the chapters afterwards. The dark side of this house he's building is that he doesn't seem to be able to understand the parts of his life that were not about this anymore. He is unsympathetic to any frivolity, anything that is bigger than it needed to be, anything flashy or anything fun. He is even impatient with any expressions of passion, need, or strong emotion. In one chapter that deals with his teenage dedication to the cause of Israel and the communist kibbutzes he lived on over several summers, and he dismisses his own passions as fundamentally ridiculous and concentrates instead on proving why he was right to leave the place and ultimately come to have a longstanding suspicion of both communism and Israel.
As he builds up his house from his childhood, it becomes tragically clear (at least to me) that he doesn’t seem to be able to remember feeling things, or else deliberately is shutting them out. Moral rectitude, incisive reasoning, sharp denunciations of nonsense, this is what he’s interested in. He wants to boil down to essentials, to get the most important stuff out because he knows that he hasn’t much time left, so it feels like he builds a narrative about “austerity,” that seeks to slowly show the reader what is left after the trifles are cleared away. He uses this to make wider points about socialism, social democracy, community, the purpose of the state, and what morality really means. With some striking exceptions (which I will discuss in a minute), you get the feeling like he feels like he has to hide any pleasure he once took in things that were not serious or essential or driven by clear ideas. When his family makes money, he's always careful to note that it wasn't too much, or temporary, or the fact that he didn't enjoy the fruits of it. When he describes his family’s European vacations, there’s a weird sort of pride in him about it, so to make up for it he has to emphasize over and over the small hotels they stayed in, the second class tickets they bought, how cheap things were in Europe, and his father’s continental heritage- like otherwise he might be a poor little rich boy we wouldn’t listen to. His father had a passion for cars, and he theorizes about what they meant to him, but he denies any similar feeling vehemently. It’s so… guilty, I guess would be the word. It also seems to completely flatten his life out in a way that doesn’t seem fair- but perhaps it is the only way he could understand it at the time. I don’t know, but its difficult not to psychoanalyze this mental exercise, which after all involves undertaking exactly the sort of diving into the past, discussions of parents, friends and lovers that a lot of psychiatry deals in.
Perhaps inevitably, it was some tiny little moments where some unexpected nostalgia, lushness, or longing broke through that were the most powerful for me. He describes the house where he grew up in London (his favorite one of the houses anyway- he hated the bigger house his parents moved to in the suburbs during a “brief interlude of prosperity”), and allows himself some lushness of description and idealization of the remnants of Victorian and Edwardian life that he finds there- the flower sellers, the last functioning stable in the city. He rigorously denies himself much nostalgia within his own life (except for morally acceptable objects that his socialist views would approve of), but he allows himself nostalgia for something he never knew, and an era he should be rights reject. He lets himself go much more towards the end in his more general, thematic essays, too. He allows himself a Victorian flourish in the chapter where he discusses how he ended up marrying his wife (which, beware, there are going to be a lot of women who won’t find his views in that chapter particularly palatable- it’s a whole thing about the negative, suspicious atmosphere that the fear of sexual harassment creates, and generally is one of those, ‘things used to be easier’ articles). It ends with a, “Reader: I married her.” His essay, “Edge People,” (which I love), romantically illustrates bygone cosmopolitan cities as he tries to articulate his own nostalgia for cultural markers, changes, and meetings, places where things were mixed, rather than cultures where boundaries seemed to disappear and melt because of all-embracing consumerism that makes everything look the same. (An earlier essay, about people who cross the Channel for merely economic purposes- to buy things, rather than to see things, which has made changing countries and areas much less visible, foreshadows this line of thought.)
My favorite, though, is his love of trains. He’s never made a secret of it, and he’s written several essays on it. His great work, Postwar opens with him at a train station. I’m actually surprised he didn’t construct a “memory train station,” rather than a chalet. Usually, though, he tries to make a point about state projects, faith in the state, infrastructure and jobs, etc. In this book, he finally looks at it in a way that seems to finally explain the root of it, and makes me understand, perhaps, why he’s been so strident about it all his life. It’s the passion that not even his disease could take from him, the one that seems to have become stronger, if anything. It seems to get at a core of something important about him that I’d never seen expressed before, something so sympathetic, so lovely, I can’t resist reproducing the passage in full here.:
“According to the literary theorist Rene Girard, we come to yearn for and eventually love those who are loved by others. I cannot confirm this from personal experience- I have a history of frustrated longings for objects and women who were palpably unavailable to me but of no particular interest to anyone else. But there is one sphere of my life in which implausibly, Girard’s theory of mimetic desire could be perfectly adapted to my experience: if by “mimetic” we mean mutuality and symmetry, rather than mimicry and contestation, I can vouch for the credibility of this proposition. I love trains, and they have always loved me back.
What does it mean to be loved by a train? Love, it seems to me, is that condition in which one is most contentedly oneself. If this sounds paradoxical, remember Rilke’s admonition: love consists in leaving the loved one space to be themselves while providing the security within which the self may flourish. As a child, I always felt uneasy and a little constrained around people, my family in particular. Solitude was bliss, but not easily obtained. Being always felt stressful- wherever I was there was something to do, someone to please, a duty to be completed, a role inadequately fulfilled: something amiss.Becoming, on the other hand, was relief. I was never so happy as when I was going somewhere on my own, and the longer it took to get there, the better. Walking was pleasurable, cycling enjoyable, bus journeys fun. But the train was very heaven.
I never bothered to explain this to parents or friends, and was thus constrained to feign objectives: places I wanted to go, people I wanted to see, things I needed to do. Lies, all of it… I took solitary tube trips around London from a very young age. If I had a goal, it was to cover the whole network, from terminus to terminus, an aspiration I came very close to achieving. What did I do when I reached the end of a line, Edgware as it might be, or Ongar? I stepped out, studied the station rather closely, glanced around me… and took the next tube back.
The technology, the architecture, and working practices of a railway system fascinated me from the outset-I can describe even today the peculiarities of the separate London Underground liens and their station layouts. But I was never a “trainspotter.” Even when I graduated to solitary travel on the extensive network of British Railways’ Southern Region I never joined the enthusiastic bands of anorak-clad preteenage boys at the end of the platforms, assiduously noting down the numbers of passing trains. This seemed to me the most asinine of static pursuits- the point of a train was to get on it.”
Out of the harshness, deprivation, austerity, and disillusion comes this wonderful paean to the one thing that his worldviews never necessitated that he abandon, that no amount of travel or time could get rid of. It becomes the essence of the things he has lost, and the memory that seems the true escape from his current condition.
I admit that I teared up when he came back to this, so fittingly, at the end. Even behind his comforting symbol of Right Thinking in Switzerland, was this pure, wonderful passion for trains that was his true home. His last paragraph reads:
“There is a path of sorts that accompanies, Murren’s pocket railway. Halfway along, a little café- the only stop on the line- serves the usual run of Swiss wayside fare. Ahead, the mountain falls steeply away into the rift valley below. Behind, you can clamber up to the summer barns with the cows and goats and shepherds. Or you can just wait for the next train: punctual, predictable and precise to the second. Nothing happens: it is the happiest place in the world. We cannot choose where we start out in life, but we may finish where we will. I know where I shall be: going nowhere in particular on that little train, forever and ever.”
I try not to indulge in too many fantasies of an uncertain afterlife, but I can’t help hoping that is exactly what he found. RIP, Professor Judt. You always knew what was important, and you helped me to see that, too. I wish I could have thanked you for that.
September 13, 2019
Όποιος έχει έρθει σε επαφή με το επιστημονικό έργο του Tony Judt & ενθουσιάστηκε δεν μπορεί να μην αναζητήσει και την πιο προσωπική γραφή του,όπως είναι το παρόν έργο.Ένα παζλ σκηνών από την προσωπική του ζωή και διαδρομή με την χαρακτηριστική εξαιρετική του πένα.Είναι πολύ κρίμα που ένα τέτοιο πνέυμα,επιστήμονα αλλά γενικότερα κοσμοπολίτη,χάθηκε τόσο νωρίς.Σιγά-σιγά τον ανακαλύπτουν και τα ελληνικά γράμματα & αυτό είναι πολύ ενθαρρυντικό!
November 20, 2015
The young woman was flabbergasted: the only form of discrimination she could imagine was sexual. It had never occurred to her that I might just be an elitist.
Allow an extra 1.25 stars for the circumstances of its origin. This is series of light pieces, incipient memory exercise that Judt steadied his mind with during the interminable nights of his terminal affliction with ALS. There is some fascinating material here, especially of a intellectual historical basis. Much appears to have been imagined in longer forms with Timothy Snyder in the Reappraisals: Reflections on the Forgotten Twentieth Century. This is an ideal commute book
Allow an extra 1.25 stars for the circumstances of its origin. This is series of light pieces, incipient memory exercise that Judt steadied his mind with during the interminable nights of his terminal affliction with ALS. There is some fascinating material here, especially of a intellectual historical basis. Much appears to have been imagined in longer forms with Timothy Snyder in the Reappraisals: Reflections on the Forgotten Twentieth Century. This is an ideal commute book
September 13, 2022
[3.25] The most remarkable thing about this collection is the way in which it was written. Judt, a historian suffering from ALS and trapped within his body, dictated the essays using the mnemnoic device of visiting various rooms of a Swiss chalet he visited in his youth. The essays are well written, especially under the circumstances, but only a couple of them stood out for me. These nostalgic musings may be of interest to Judt fans who want to learn more about his past but I often found his perspective bland and old fashioned.
Read
March 3, 2024Цікава книга незрозумілого статусу.
На жаль, інакше підсумувати не вийде.
З одного боку, ця книга нічого не скаже тим, хто не читав Джадта. Адже це дуже суб'єктивна підбірка спогадів з 1950-х до 1990-х. З них не збагнути, якою людиною був Джадт, бо в них мало фактажу, але багато суб'єктивних вражень. Так, вони також говорять про Джадта багато. Але якщо ви не були "знайомі" з ним раніше, то... Чому читати нотатки якогось історика?
З іншого боку, якщо ви вже читали Джадта, то ця книга... також не для вас, бо ці нотатки надто персональні. Як не дивно, але "Шале" найкраще читати після "Роздумів про двадцяте століття". Бо саме в цій книзі інтерв'ю Джадт і показує, як його особиста біографія пов'язана з історичним та соціальним контекстом. Але й тут є проблема: історії на ¾ повторюються в обох книгах. Тобто одні й ті ж випадки переказуються автором в обох книгах. Чи це проблема? Для мене - ні. Адже навіть одні й ті ж історії різняться деталями та акцкетами. Тому це було цікаве читання. Але якщо вас цікавить постать Джадта, то "Шале" може видатися повтором.
Особисто я радий, що прочитав "Шале". Для мене це наче "Кульбабове вино", але написане соціологом. Джадт відчуває ностальгію за минулим, але пояснює, чому: не за минулим заради минулого, а за соціальним ладом, який зник в 1980-х завдяки неолібералам. Тому Джадт не стільки ностальгує, скільки аналізує, що ми втратили завдяки неолібералізму. І які загрози це несе для всього людства. В цьому плані це також моральний трактат.
Як і всі передсмертні книги Джадта.
На жаль, інакше підсумувати не вийде.
З одного боку, ця книга нічого не скаже тим, хто не читав Джадта. Адже це дуже суб'єктивна підбірка спогадів з 1950-х до 1990-х. З них не збагнути, якою людиною був Джадт, бо в них мало фактажу, але багато суб'єктивних вражень. Так, вони також говорять про Джадта багато. Але якщо ви не були "знайомі" з ним раніше, то... Чому читати нотатки якогось історика?
З іншого боку, якщо ви вже читали Джадта, то ця книга... також не для вас, бо ці нотатки надто персональні. Як не дивно, але "Шале" найкраще читати після "Роздумів про двадцяте століття". Бо саме в цій книзі інтерв'ю Джадт і показує, як його особиста біографія пов'язана з історичним та соціальним контекстом. Але й тут є проблема: історії на ¾ повторюються в обох книгах. Тобто одні й ті ж випадки переказуються автором в обох книгах. Чи це проблема? Для мене - ні. Адже навіть одні й ті ж історії різняться деталями та акцкетами. Тому це було цікаве читання. Але якщо вас цікавить постать Джадта, то "Шале" може видатися повтором.
Особисто я радий, що прочитав "Шале". Для мене це наче "Кульбабове вино", але написане соціологом. Джадт відчуває ностальгію за минулим, але пояснює, чому: не за минулим заради минулого, а за соціальним ладом, який зник в 1980-х завдяки неолібералам. Тому Джадт не стільки ностальгує, скільки аналізує, що ми втратили завдяки неолібералізму. І які загрози це несе для всього людства. В цьому плані це також моральний трактат.
Як і всі передсмертні книги Джадта.
April 15, 2023
"Post-war", the magnum opus of Judt was impressive. And also in this book he proves he was a very judicious historian and observer of his time. On top of that, what he had to go through, at the end of his life, struggling with ALS, was horrible. But progressive circles have made him into a cult figure, the last guardian of the social democratic legacy (social democratic in the broad sense of the word), and really, that is too much honor.
In this book Judt looks back on his life and to be honest, that wasn't so very interesting. True, He was a child of his time and has seen quite a bit of the world, but it turns out that at the end of his life Judt believed that it used to be better in the past decades and that everything was going for the worse. Now, sure, things aren't going that good lately, and a bit of nostalgia is very, very human, but as a historian Judt should have know better. What a pity.
In this book Judt looks back on his life and to be honest, that wasn't so very interesting. True, He was a child of his time and has seen quite a bit of the world, but it turns out that at the end of his life Judt believed that it used to be better in the past decades and that everything was going for the worse. Now, sure, things aren't going that good lately, and a bit of nostalgia is very, very human, but as a historian Judt should have know better. What a pity.
January 27, 2023
Тоні Джадт «Шале памʼяті» — збірка есеїв, що надихає.
Наприкінці життя Джадт хворів, коли він опинявся сам один знерухомлений посеред ночі, то йому потрібен був спосіб, щоби полегшити свій стан. Так, він почав подумки мандрувати у місце, де часто бував дитиною — шале в Швейцарії, він згадував кімнати й населяв їх історіями зі свого життя.
Це книжка про єврейського хлопчика, який виростав у Лондоні та про єврейську ідентичність: «Тільки з того, що ти виріс на поганій їжі, не випливає, що ти не відчуваєш ностальгії за нею».
Про традиції британськиї коледжів — поважних місць, подекуди готових до інновацій та поступливих.
Про юнака, який захоплювався соціалістичним сіонізмом та жив у кібуці, а потім відмовився від сількогосподарського життя в Ізраїлі заради Кембриджу.
Про карʼєру історика, який став американцем і завдяки дистанції навів свій «фокус» на дослідження Європи.
Про кризу середнього віку, яка підштовхнула до вивчення чеської мови, що натомість спровокувало інтерес до всього регіону, пошук свого профілю, написання історії повоєнної Європи: «вивчення чеської, зробило мене науковцем, істориком та особою зовсім іншого ґатунку».
Це не типова книжка про історію і зовсім не біографія історика, це есеї про непересічну особистість, яка наприкінці життя прагне щось зрозуміти, поділитися, пригадати, зафіксувати свій час — цілу епоху між Beatles та Twitter. Мене захопили есеї — стиль і теми, спосіб говоріння про себе, оповіді про освітні системи Європи й Америки, допитливість і мандри, неймовірна ерудованість та складна фізична праця до якої прибігав дослідник, коли потребував простору для наукової роботи.
Отримала діалог, якого так потребувала. Мені здавалося, що Джадт говорить до мене і про мене, що ми на одній хвилі, попри те, що між нами є дистанція, різні досіди, мови, а ще ми у різних часових площинах. Мені страшенно хотілося відповісти йому і обійнятися. Подумала, що якби він був живим, то я би навіть знайшла його пошту і написала йому листа.
З есею «Міметичне бажання» «Ніколи я не почувався настільки щасливим, як тоді, коли кудись прямував наодинці, і що довшою була моя подорож, то краще. Ходити — приємність, кататися на велосипеді — радість, Їздити автобусом — втіха. А от потяг завжди був неабиякою благодаттю».
З есею «Революціонери» «Я народився в Англії 1948 року, достатньо пізно, щоб уникнути військової повинності, але вчасно для «Бітлз»: мені було чотирнадцять, коли вони зявилися зі своїм Love Me Do. Через три роки виринули перші міні-спідниці: я був уже достатньо дорослий, щоб цінувати їхні переваги, але надто юний, щоб якось цим скористатись. Я зростав в епоху процвітання, безпеки та комфорту — а тому, коли 1968 року мені стукнуло двадцять, я збунтувався. Як і багато бейбі-бумерів, я був конформістом у своєму нонконформізмі».
З есею «Тоні» «Ми охоче визнаємо власні обов'язки перед сучасниками; але як щодо обов'язків перед тими, хто жив раніше? Ми переконливо говоримо про те, чим завдячуємо майбутньому — але як щодо нашого боргу перед минулим? За винятком цілковито практичних способів — збереження інституцій чи будівель — ми можемо виплатити цей борг, лише якнайповніше пам'ятаючи й передаючи далі обов'язок пам'ятати».
«Іншого разу якась студентка поскаржилася, що я «дискримінував» її, бо вона не пропонувала сексуальних послуг. Коли омбудсвумен відділу — поміркована пані з бездоганно радикальною кваліфікацією — провела розслідування, то виявилося, що оскаржувачка розгнівалась, бо її не запросили приєднатися до мого семінару: вона дійшла висновку, що до жінок, які брали в ньому участь, я ставлюсь по-особливому, і від них отримую щось особливе. Я пояснив, що вони брали участь тому, що розумніші. Молода жінка була просто-таки ошелешена: єдиною формою дискримінації, яку вона могла собі уявити, була сексуальна. Їй навіть на думку не спадало, що я міг виявитися елітистом»
Наприкінці життя Джадт хворів, коли він опинявся сам один знерухомлений посеред ночі, то йому потрібен був спосіб, щоби полегшити свій стан. Так, він почав подумки мандрувати у місце, де часто бував дитиною — шале в Швейцарії, він згадував кімнати й населяв їх історіями зі свого життя.
Це книжка про єврейського хлопчика, який виростав у Лондоні та про єврейську ідентичність: «Тільки з того, що ти виріс на поганій їжі, не випливає, що ти не відчуваєш ностальгії за нею».
Про традиції британськиї коледжів — поважних місць, подекуди готових до інновацій та поступливих.
Про юнака, який захоплювався соціалістичним сіонізмом та жив у кібуці, а потім відмовився від сількогосподарського життя в Ізраїлі заради Кембриджу.
Про карʼєру історика, який став американцем і завдяки дистанції навів свій «фокус» на дослідження Європи.
Про кризу середнього віку, яка підштовхнула до вивчення чеської мови, що натомість спровокувало інтерес до всього регіону, пошук свого профілю, написання історії повоєнної Європи: «вивчення чеської, зробило мене науковцем, істориком та особою зовсім іншого ґатунку».
Це не типова книжка про історію і зовсім не біографія історика, це есеї про непересічну особистість, яка наприкінці життя прагне щось зрозуміти, поділитися, пригадати, зафіксувати свій час — цілу епоху між Beatles та Twitter. Мене захопили есеї — стиль і теми, спосіб говоріння про себе, оповіді про освітні системи Європи й Америки, допитливість і мандри, неймовірна ерудованість та складна фізична праця до якої прибігав дослідник, коли потребував простору для наукової роботи.
Отримала діалог, якого так потребувала. Мені здавалося, що Джадт говорить до мене і про мене, що ми на одній хвилі, попри те, що між нами є дистанція, різні досіди, мови, а ще ми у різних часових площинах. Мені страшенно хотілося відповісти йому і обійнятися. Подумала, що якби він був живим, то я би навіть знайшла його пошту і написала йому листа.
З есею «Міметичне бажання» «Ніколи я не почувався настільки щасливим, як тоді, коли кудись прямував наодинці, і що довшою була моя подорож, то краще. Ходити — приємність, кататися на велосипеді — радість, Їздити автобусом — втіха. А от потяг завжди був неабиякою благодаттю».
З есею «Революціонери» «Я народився в Англії 1948 року, достатньо пізно, щоб уникнути військової повинності, але вчасно для «Бітлз»: мені було чотирнадцять, коли вони зявилися зі своїм Love Me Do. Через три роки виринули перші міні-спідниці: я був уже достатньо дорослий, щоб цінувати їхні переваги, але надто юний, щоб якось цим скористатись. Я зростав в епоху процвітання, безпеки та комфорту — а тому, коли 1968 року мені стукнуло двадцять, я збунтувався. Як і багато бейбі-бумерів, я був конформістом у своєму нонконформізмі».
З есею «Тоні» «Ми охоче визнаємо власні обов'язки перед сучасниками; але як щодо обов'язків перед тими, хто жив раніше? Ми переконливо говоримо про те, чим завдячуємо майбутньому — але як щодо нашого боргу перед минулим? За винятком цілковито практичних способів — збереження інституцій чи будівель — ми можемо виплатити цей борг, лише якнайповніше пам'ятаючи й передаючи далі обов'язок пам'ятати».
«Іншого разу якась студентка поскаржилася, що я «дискримінував» її, бо вона не пропонувала сексуальних послуг. Коли омбудсвумен відділу — поміркована пані з бездоганно радикальною кваліфікацією — провела розслідування, то виявилося, що оскаржувачка розгнівалась, бо її не запросили приєднатися до мого семінару: вона дійшла висновку, що до жінок, які брали в ньому участь, я ставлюсь по-особливому, і від них отримую щось особливе. Я пояснив, що вони брали участь тому, що розумніші. Молода жінка була просто-таки ошелешена: єдиною формою дискримінації, яку вона могла собі уявити, була сексуальна. Їй навіть на думку не спадало, що я міг виявитися елітистом»
Read
June 13, 2017A moving, thought provoking book by a man in the final stages of a neurodegenerative disorder for whom roaming the corridors of his own mind is about the only pleasure left in life. But what wonderful reflections he leaves us as he wanders through the rooms of his personal memory chalet; thoughts about train travel, growing up in post war London, the British education system, an adolescent dalliance with Labour Zionism, life at Cambridge, revolution, living in New York, national identities versus cosmopolitanism and finally back again to trains and one particular train winding its way around a quiet mountain in remotest Switzerland which, by the end of the book, we imagine Tony Judt traveling in perpetuity.
Review by Fionnuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Review by Fionnuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
October 8, 2021
The Memory Chalet by Tony Judt is a memoir unlike any you have ever read before. It is a collection of previously unpublished essays by this author that were assembled and published after his death. Each essay charts some experience or remembrance of the past through the sieve of Tony Judt s prodigious mind. His youthful love of a particular London bus route evolves into a reflection on public civility and interwar urban planning. Memories of the 1968 student riots of Paris meander through the divergent sex politics of Europe, before concluding that his generation was a revolutionary generation, but missed the revolution. A series of road trips across America lead not just to an appreciation of American history, but to an eventual acquisition of citizenship. Foods and trains and long-lost smells all compete for Judt's attention; but for us, he has forged his varied reflections into an elegant arc of analysis. All as simply and beautifully arranged as a Swiss chalet—a reassuring refuge deep in the mountains of memory.
October 6, 2023
Я не читав Тоні Джадта раніше і тепер, щойно дочитавши "Шале пам'яті", думаю, що можна було б познайомитися з його творчістю швидше, але і так добре, бо хочу ще.
Коли наприкінці життя автор захворів на бічний аміотрофічний склероз – це спричинило втрату ним більшості ступенів свободи і таким чином все, що приємно бентежило, радувало, втішало та наповнювало відчуттям благодаті у його попередньому житті, залишилося лише в спогадах.
Не маючи змоги писати, Тоні Джадт вибудував собі у власній пам'яті сховок – шале у горах в Швейцарії, куди він одного разу в дитинстві їздив з батьками на відпочинок, чи то пак, як зазначено в чудовому перекладі Софії Андрухович – вакації.
Позаяк, страждаючи від хвороби, автор майже не міг спати, він шукав прихисток в думках про найкращі, найсвітліші, найцікавіші миті свого життя, а також мав час і натхнення вирефоексуваті їх у есеї досконалої форми та змісту.
Перетворивши таке шале на метод, Тоні Джадт наповнює кожну кімнату цієї уявної будівлі різноманітними мемуарами: про дитинство та юність, про своє навчання у Кембриджі і систему освіти загалом, про автомобілі, якими захоплювався його батько, про післявоєнне життя у Лондоні, про любов до подорожей потягами і автобусами, про своє захоплення сіонізмом в юності і ставлення до своєї ідентичності загалом та держави Ізраїль зокрема, про одяг і про їжу, про свою кар'єру американського історика, про життя у Нью-Йорку, про кризу середнього віку і навіть про те, де йому б хотілося провести останні дні життя.
Ці ностальгічні есеї написані якимось особливо світлим і теплим способом. Читаючи про те, як знерухомлений хворобою автор намагається знайти сенс перебування в неслухняному і майже чужому тілі через спогади про миті, які були наповнені рухом, змістом, чуттєвістю, роботою, проникаєшся водночас співчуттям і захватом, бо здатність Тоні Джадта до заглиблення у себе дуже надихає.
Прекрасна книга для наших темних часів.
Коли наприкінці життя автор захворів на бічний аміотрофічний склероз – це спричинило втрату ним більшості ступенів свободи і таким чином все, що приємно бентежило, радувало, втішало та наповнювало відчуттям благодаті у його попередньому житті, залишилося лише в спогадах.
Не маючи змоги писати, Тоні Джадт вибудував собі у власній пам'яті сховок – шале у горах в Швейцарії, куди він одного разу в дитинстві їздив з батьками на відпочинок, чи то пак, як зазначено в чудовому перекладі Софії Андрухович – вакації.
Позаяк, страждаючи від хвороби, автор майже не міг спати, він шукав прихисток в думках про найкращі, найсвітліші, найцікавіші миті свого життя, а також мав час і натхнення вирефоексуваті їх у есеї досконалої форми та змісту.
Перетворивши таке шале на метод, Тоні Джадт наповнює кожну кімнату цієї уявної будівлі різноманітними мемуарами: про дитинство та юність, про своє навчання у Кембриджі і систему освіти загалом, про автомобілі, якими захоплювався його батько, про післявоєнне життя у Лондоні, про любов до подорожей потягами і автобусами, про своє захоплення сіонізмом в юності і ставлення до своєї ідентичності загалом та держави Ізраїль зокрема, про одяг і про їжу, про свою кар'єру американського історика, про життя у Нью-Йорку, про кризу середнього віку і навіть про те, де йому б хотілося провести останні дні життя.
Ці ностальгічні есеї написані якимось особливо світлим і теплим способом. Читаючи про те, як знерухомлений хворобою автор намагається знайти сенс перебування в неслухняному і майже чужому тілі через спогади про миті, які були наповнені рухом, змістом, чуттєвістю, роботою, проникаєшся водночас співчуттям і захватом, бо здатність Тоні Джадта до заглиблення у себе дуже надихає.
Прекрасна книга для наших темних часів.
May 1, 2021
Giving this one five stars (slightly rounded up perhaps) as it proved consistently engaging, where I'd had doubts I could get into it. Most of the essays cover his earlier life in the 50s/60s, with some focusing on his later life in the USA as an established adult. I hadn't read anything of his previously, fearing the tone might be too... intellectual for me. He's obviously an academic genius, though not at all condescending. Can't recall all of the topics covered in the collection, but here goes...
His childhood as neither a full-blown immigrant, nor a bona-fide Englishman (his father an immigrant who spoke perfect English, his mother a first-generation Brit). His Jewish background presented in a compartmentalized form, pretty much only at family gatherings; on a daily basis the family would be considered assimilated. Near the end, he informs readers what "being Jewish" means for him. These pieces are strong pluses, as well as his memories of post-war England generally. For me, the weakest had to do with his time studying in Paris. Judt's Cambridge days were interesting as a bridge between the traditional, classic literature portrait of student life, and what younger (under 50 say) grads would find realistic.
Finally, I should mention that when I grew envious of his achievements at times, I was able to snap out of it recalling his first couple of chapters on life with ALS - not self-pitying, but no "laff riot" either. Really glad I read this one, and definitely considering more of his output!
His childhood as neither a full-blown immigrant, nor a bona-fide Englishman (his father an immigrant who spoke perfect English, his mother a first-generation Brit). His Jewish background presented in a compartmentalized form, pretty much only at family gatherings; on a daily basis the family would be considered assimilated. Near the end, he informs readers what "being Jewish" means for him. These pieces are strong pluses, as well as his memories of post-war England generally. For me, the weakest had to do with his time studying in Paris. Judt's Cambridge days were interesting as a bridge between the traditional, classic literature portrait of student life, and what younger (under 50 say) grads would find realistic.
Finally, I should mention that when I grew envious of his achievements at times, I was able to snap out of it recalling his first couple of chapters on life with ALS - not self-pitying, but no "laff riot" either. Really glad I read this one, and definitely considering more of his output!
September 24, 2012
Such a haunting and beautiful book by such a brilliant man.
While dying of ALS Judt envisions heaven as a train on which he rides continuously through the Alps. This evocative imagery has stayed with me and probably always will.
While becoming progressively “locked in” by ALS, Judt’s mind remains very much alive. He escapes into “the memory chalet,” a Swiss chalet he stayed in on holidays as a child. He recalls in his memory every room, nook and cranny, the smells, the food, the snow, the happy memories.
He does this with other memories of his life as well, and shares these memories with the reader. We are the better for it.
Judt who had made such a huge contribution to all of us through his life long scholarship, continues to make a huge contribution to us as he dies. He let’s us realize the power of our minds to help us escape from intolerable circumstances and shows us that memories can be almost as powerful as reality.
Somehow, through brutal honesty, and no-sugar coating, he makes the process of dying from something as horrific as ALS seem less terrifying. His memories provide great comfort to him and to the reader.
Highly recommend this inspiring and moving book.
I wish Judt endless sunny skies on his train as he rides through the Alps.
While dying of ALS Judt envisions heaven as a train on which he rides continuously through the Alps. This evocative imagery has stayed with me and probably always will.
While becoming progressively “locked in” by ALS, Judt’s mind remains very much alive. He escapes into “the memory chalet,” a Swiss chalet he stayed in on holidays as a child. He recalls in his memory every room, nook and cranny, the smells, the food, the snow, the happy memories.
He does this with other memories of his life as well, and shares these memories with the reader. We are the better for it.
Judt who had made such a huge contribution to all of us through his life long scholarship, continues to make a huge contribution to us as he dies. He let’s us realize the power of our minds to help us escape from intolerable circumstances and shows us that memories can be almost as powerful as reality.
Somehow, through brutal honesty, and no-sugar coating, he makes the process of dying from something as horrific as ALS seem less terrifying. His memories provide great comfort to him and to the reader.
Highly recommend this inspiring and moving book.
I wish Judt endless sunny skies on his train as he rides through the Alps.
August 19, 2023
це 4,5⭐️
хороші рефлексії про прожите життя. моментами трохи песимістично, моментами з абсолютним прийняттям усіх подій і своєрідною радістю. винесла для себе хороші думки з неї, більшого мабуть і не треба
хороші рефлексії про прожите життя. моментами трохи песимістично, моментами з абсолютним прийняттям усіх подій і своєрідною радістю. винесла для себе хороші думки з неї, більшого мабуть і не треба
January 10, 2023
Я прям зацінила цю книгу. Дуже цікава, як свідчення про різні часи і місця. Написана послідовним і цілісним науковцем.
І одночасно така, яку могла написати тільки людина з наближенням смертельного діагнозу - в останніх кількох ессе виписав звіздюлєй багатьом групам та інтелектуальним підходам.
Але таких, як строга бабуся. З великої любові і прагнення покращити.
І одночасно така, яку могла написати тільки людина з наближенням смертельного діагнозу - в останніх кількох ессе виписав звіздюлєй багатьом групам та інтелектуальним підходам.
Але таких, як строга бабуся. З великої любові і прагнення покращити.
August 22, 2021
Thanks to Ilse for recommending it to me after a memory palace rearrangement… m
“Imagine that you had been obliged to lie absolutely motionless on your back—constrained to come up with ways to render this Calvary tolerable for the rest of your life.
My solution has been to scroll through my life, my thoughts, my fantasies, my memories, mis-memories, and the like until I have chanced upon events, people, or narratives that I can employ to divert my mind from the body in which it is encased.”
Read
January 22, 2022RIP to Tony Judt, one of the most ecumenical thinkers of the modern era, a man who saw through the bullshit far better than most, who could draw connections across a vast spectrum of the human experience, and who saw the decline of the postwar social-democratic consensus in the West as the existential threat it truly was, even as so many in his intellectual milieu were either ensnared by the idiocies of neoconservatism or hoodwinked by the false prophets of neoliberalism. Here he is looking back on a long and varied life, a Proust with infinite madeleines ranging from the vibes of Paris in '68 to familial Jewish feasts, as he became imprisoned in his own body by one of the cruelest of diseases, trying to record his greatest hits before he would become unable to do so. Granted, they're not all bangers -- they can't be, and the piece about campus sexual politics reminds me of every boomer who grouses that "you can't even COMPLIMENT a goddamn woman nowadays," and I say that as someone who is himself the product of an illict relationship between a charming tweedy professor and a bright young co-ed. But that's a minor blight, all things considered. Reading The Memory Chalet... it made me wish that Judt was still around to comment on the horrors of the present era. And that's a high compliment indeed.
August 15, 2025
Останнім часом мене тягне до меланхолійних щоденникових ностальгій. Тоні Джадт "вписався" під настрій.
📚 У дитинстві я часто почувався неспокійно й дещо скуто поруч з іншими людьми, особливо — зі своїми родичами. Самотність була благословенням, що досягалося не найлегше. Буття завжди мало присмак стресу — де б я не був, там завжди на мене чекало завдання, доводилось комусь догоджати, виконувати обов’язок, вдосконалювати неадекватно зіграну роль: щось діялося невлад.
📚Якщо це звучить парадоксально, пригадайте зауваження Рільке: любов — це надати коханій особі простір, де вона зможе бути собою, водночас створюючи безпеку, за якої самість коханої особи процвітатиме.
📚Кожен із нас випадково народився у своєму місті, а не в іншому, кожен пройшов крізь розмаїті тимчасові домівки упродовж свого мандрівного життя — принаймні саме так усе складалося для мене.
📚Багато десятиліть тому мені порадили вивчати літературу; за словами мудрого наставника, історія надто відчутно зіграла б на природі моїх інстинктів, схиляючи мене до того, що дається найлегше. Література — особливо поезія — змусила б мене відшукати всередині себе невідомі слова та стилі, до яких у мене може розвинутися певний потяг.
📚...Повертаються обличчя, приклади допасовуються, сепієві фотокартки оживають, «усе поєднується» — і вже за кілька хвилин я маю свою історію, персонажів, ілюстрації і мораль. Альпійський дідусь і його нестравні спогади про світ, який втратив, нічого не важать: минуле огортає мене, і я отримую те, чого потребую.
📚Існує щось на кшталт стежки, яка зміїться вздовж кишенькової залізниці Мюррена. На півдорозі у маленькому кафе — єдиній зупинці на лінії — подають звичні страви зі швейцарського придорожнього меню. Попереду гора стрімко падає в ущелину з долиною на дні. Позаду можна видряпатися до літніх стаєнь із коровами, козами та пастухами. А можна просто зачекати наступного потяга: пунктуального, передбачуваного й точного до секунди. Нічого не відбувається: це найщасливіше місце на світі. Ми не можемо вибирати, де розпочнемо власне життя, але можемо закінчити його там, де бажаємо. Я знаю, де зроблю це сам: їдучи без особливої мети на цьому маленькому потязі, на віки вічні.
📚 У дитинстві я часто почувався неспокійно й дещо скуто поруч з іншими людьми, особливо — зі своїми родичами. Самотність була благословенням, що досягалося не найлегше. Буття завжди мало присмак стресу — де б я не був, там завжди на мене чекало завдання, доводилось комусь догоджати, виконувати обов’язок, вдосконалювати неадекватно зіграну роль: щось діялося невлад.
📚Якщо це звучить парадоксально, пригадайте зауваження Рільке: любов — це надати коханій особі простір, де вона зможе бути собою, водночас створюючи безпеку, за якої самість коханої особи процвітатиме.
📚Кожен із нас випадково народився у своєму місті, а не в іншому, кожен пройшов крізь розмаїті тимчасові домівки упродовж свого мандрівного життя — принаймні саме так усе складалося для мене.
📚Багато десятиліть тому мені порадили вивчати літературу; за словами мудрого наставника, історія надто відчутно зіграла б на природі моїх інстинктів, схиляючи мене до того, що дається найлегше. Література — особливо поезія — змусила б мене відшукати всередині себе невідомі слова та стилі, до яких у мене може розвинутися певний потяг.
📚...Повертаються обличчя, приклади допасовуються, сепієві фотокартки оживають, «усе поєднується» — і вже за кілька хвилин я маю свою історію, персонажів, ілюстрації і мораль. Альпійський дідусь і його нестравні спогади про світ, який втратив, нічого не важать: минуле огортає мене, і я отримую те, чого потребую.
📚Існує щось на кшталт стежки, яка зміїться вздовж кишенькової залізниці Мюррена. На півдорозі у маленькому кафе — єдиній зупинці на лінії — подають звичні страви зі швейцарського придорожнього меню. Попереду гора стрімко падає в ущелину з долиною на дні. Позаду можна видряпатися до літніх стаєнь із коровами, козами та пастухами. А можна просто зачекати наступного потяга: пунктуального, передбачуваного й точного до секунди. Нічого не відбувається: це найщасливіше місце на світі. Ми не можемо вибирати, де розпочнемо власне життя, але можемо закінчити його там, де бажаємо. Я знаю, де зроблю це сам: їдучи без особливої мети на цьому маленькому потязі, на віки вічні.
January 8, 2023
Перш ніж взятися за книгу Тоні Джадта "Світ після війни" я вирішила прочитати цю. Книга автобіографічна, надиктована автором коли хвороба почала сковувати та унерухомлювати його тіло. Книга не являє собою класичну автобіографію, а скоріш схожа на скриньку спогадів автора
May 3, 2016
dychberúca a hlavurozširujúca šleha! z ktorej keď sa spamätám, tak napíšem rozvinuté vety. (11/1)
dopĺňam dojmy (13/1)
Čaká ma dlhá cesta vlakom. Keď ho zazriem v nedeľný podvečer prichádzať na ufúľanú bratislavskú stanicu, poteším sa. Predstavujem si, ako budeme v teplom kupéčku - spolu s ostatnými prevažne vzdelávacím systémom vyhostenými a po poznaní hladujúcimi študentmi a študentkami - ako krvinky v tepne pretínať uzimené polia a lesy. Ešte iba tuším - neviem, že ma čaká dočítanie krásnej životnej výpovede zarámovanej do toho najvkusnejšie vybraného, podstatnými detailmi zdobeného historického rámu. Táto výpoveď sa tiež vezie odniekiaľ niekam.. vo vlaku. Navždy.
Tony Judt bol britsko-americko-židovsko-aktovieešteaký(a-čo-tam-vlastne-po-tom) historik s vedomosťami a citom pre strednú Európu a dianie v nej. Nebolo tomu tak vždy. Jeho záujem o krajinky, v ktorých priestoroch najintenzívnejšie prežívam a stávam sa začal až v dynamickom období, keď sa tieto krajiny prebúdzali k novým podobám. O 26 rokov – celý môj doterajší život – na to, v čase, kedy Judt píše túto knihu, je jasné, že onedlho zomrie. Kým sa tak stane, bude prebývať v tele postihnutom vážnym neurologickým ochorením (ALS). S vedomím vlastnej absolútne beznádejnej prognózy, čoraz v horšom stave. Nie ľahká situácia. "Zmysluplnosť utrpenia" skloňovaná tak často kresťanmi, ani start-up-istami, manažérmi a psychológmi frekventovane skloňované slovo „výzva“ tu na vysvetlenie situácie akosi, hm, tragikomicky nepostačuje.
Totiž.. to, čo je napísané v tejto knihe presahuje slová. Je to dielo nad jazykom, dielo žitia. Existenciálna tiesňava premenená na šíru lúku života, resp. spomínania na ňu. Jej vyvolávanie v chorobou znehybnenom tele. Transcendencia spomienkami. Čítanie tejto knihy pripomína životodarné prebývanie v košatých spomienkach na rôznorodé a bezhraničné podoby Tonyho Judta – rozhľadeného, vnímavého, sebareflektívneho a kritického, citlivo cynického a preto vzácne vtipného obyčajného človeka. Kapitoly z jeho každodennosti sú skoncentrovaným významom podstatného bez zbytočných slov. No áno, presný opak toho, na čo som zvyknutá z virtuálnych a iných priestorov, v ktorých sme sa my ľudia („ktorí medzi sebou komunikujeme ako sms-ky") udomácnili. Holá výpoveď o týchto živých spomienkach ma zasiahla (a myslím, že je to univerzálna schopnosť tejto knihy) do toho najčervenejšieho stredu človeka a vyburcovala vo mne zvedavosť. Chcela by som si túto knihu alebo aspoň niektoré jej časti prečítať ešte na gympli. Napríklad namiesto tých niekoľko veľa školských chvíľ, počas ktorých nám dejepisár ukazoval, že sa pod pyramídou dá nabrúsiť žiletka alebo roztopiť maslo. Jááj - ako veľmi by som to chcela! Nevadí, vlak zastavil, ale iba na chvíľku.
Keď som z vlaku vystúpila na pražskej železničnej stanici premkol ma pocit ako ešte nikdy - jeden z tých zaznávaných pravdo-láskařských a najhavlovskejších, ale o veľa sýtejší. Cesta medzi svetom strednej Európy a svetom západu (v tom najlepšom zmysle slova a s myšlienkou na (aj) Judtové sympatie k uvedomelému odriekaniu v porovnaní s oslavou konzumu) pre mňa ešte nikdy nebola priepustnejšia. Vďaka za to, že obojstranne!
dopĺňam dojmy (13/1)
Čaká ma dlhá cesta vlakom. Keď ho zazriem v nedeľný podvečer prichádzať na ufúľanú bratislavskú stanicu, poteším sa. Predstavujem si, ako budeme v teplom kupéčku - spolu s ostatnými prevažne vzdelávacím systémom vyhostenými a po poznaní hladujúcimi študentmi a študentkami - ako krvinky v tepne pretínať uzimené polia a lesy. Ešte iba tuším - neviem, že ma čaká dočítanie krásnej životnej výpovede zarámovanej do toho najvkusnejšie vybraného, podstatnými detailmi zdobeného historického rámu. Táto výpoveď sa tiež vezie odniekiaľ niekam.. vo vlaku. Navždy.
Tony Judt bol britsko-americko-židovsko-aktovieešteaký(a-čo-tam-vlastne-po-tom) historik s vedomosťami a citom pre strednú Európu a dianie v nej. Nebolo tomu tak vždy. Jeho záujem o krajinky, v ktorých priestoroch najintenzívnejšie prežívam a stávam sa začal až v dynamickom období, keď sa tieto krajiny prebúdzali k novým podobám. O 26 rokov – celý môj doterajší život – na to, v čase, kedy Judt píše túto knihu, je jasné, že onedlho zomrie. Kým sa tak stane, bude prebývať v tele postihnutom vážnym neurologickým ochorením (ALS). S vedomím vlastnej absolútne beznádejnej prognózy, čoraz v horšom stave. Nie ľahká situácia. "Zmysluplnosť utrpenia" skloňovaná tak často kresťanmi, ani start-up-istami, manažérmi a psychológmi frekventovane skloňované slovo „výzva“ tu na vysvetlenie situácie akosi, hm, tragikomicky nepostačuje.
Totiž.. to, čo je napísané v tejto knihe presahuje slová. Je to dielo nad jazykom, dielo žitia. Existenciálna tiesňava premenená na šíru lúku života, resp. spomínania na ňu. Jej vyvolávanie v chorobou znehybnenom tele. Transcendencia spomienkami. Čítanie tejto knihy pripomína životodarné prebývanie v košatých spomienkach na rôznorodé a bezhraničné podoby Tonyho Judta – rozhľadeného, vnímavého, sebareflektívneho a kritického, citlivo cynického a preto vzácne vtipného obyčajného človeka. Kapitoly z jeho každodennosti sú skoncentrovaným významom podstatného bez zbytočných slov. No áno, presný opak toho, na čo som zvyknutá z virtuálnych a iných priestorov, v ktorých sme sa my ľudia („ktorí medzi sebou komunikujeme ako sms-ky") udomácnili. Holá výpoveď o týchto živých spomienkach ma zasiahla (a myslím, že je to univerzálna schopnosť tejto knihy) do toho najčervenejšieho stredu človeka a vyburcovala vo mne zvedavosť. Chcela by som si túto knihu alebo aspoň niektoré jej časti prečítať ešte na gympli. Napríklad namiesto tých niekoľko veľa školských chvíľ, počas ktorých nám dejepisár ukazoval, že sa pod pyramídou dá nabrúsiť žiletka alebo roztopiť maslo. Jááj - ako veľmi by som to chcela! Nevadí, vlak zastavil, ale iba na chvíľku.
Keď som z vlaku vystúpila na pražskej železničnej stanici premkol ma pocit ako ešte nikdy - jeden z tých zaznávaných pravdo-láskařských a najhavlovskejších, ale o veľa sýtejší. Cesta medzi svetom strednej Európy a svetom západu (v tom najlepšom zmysle slova a s myšlienkou na (aj) Judtové sympatie k uvedomelému odriekaniu v porovnaní s oslavou konzumu) pre mňa ešte nikdy nebola priepustnejšia. Vďaka za to, že obojstranne!
December 26, 2010
Judt's tragic death from Lou Gehrig's disease was preceded by its horrifying symptoms--a creeping paralysis which makes movement and then communication impossible. While he lay in bed each night, unable to move from his bed, Judt composed these wonderful essays in his head and then dictated them the next day. After having read both this and Ill Fares the Land, I can only say that if one must be trapped inside a mind--unimaginable as that is--I can think of few minds it would be better to be trapped in than Tony Judt's. Articulate, compassionate, cosmopolitan, well-read and well-traveled, Judt moves through the very expansive confines of his memory chalet and shares his travels with the reader. None of the essays are simply "personal"--discussions of his love of riding trains leads to a discussion of the decline of public rail systems and what this means (something he discusses in "Ill Fares" as well). Memories of his education leads him to think about what a public education means and what its goals should be. A terrible loss of a writer I only just "found." I hope more people discover him as I did. I know I'll never be able to ride the railroad again without thinking of him...
March 24, 2023
Дуже затишна перша частина мемуарів, яка стосується дитинства Тоні. Доволі претензійна середина (зі специфічними деталями життя студентів Оксбриджу) і цікава заключна частина, в якій є над чим задуматися
Однозначно хороша книга. Хочу ще щось Джадта почитати
І цю перечитати в оригіналі😏
Однозначно хороша книга. Хочу ще щось Джадта почитати
І цю перечитати в оригіналі😏
May 11, 2025
Ik mag het niet vergelijken, maar als Tony Judt in de eerste column vertelt hoe hij, lijdend aan ALS, in slapeloze nachten in zijn geheugen de feiten verzamelt die hij dan de volgende dag zo goed en zo kwaad mogelijk dicteert, moet ik denken aan hoe ik ook graag 's ochtends nog een halfuurtje blijf liggen en in mijn hoofd begin te schrijven. Ik mag het niet vergelijken, want ik heb enkel het plezier, niet de pijnloze pijn van niet meer werkende spieren, ik zit niet opgesloten in mijn lichaam zoals bij hem het geval was en die van deze erudiete teksten evenvele huzarenstukjes maakt.
In het eerste deel over zijn kindertijd overheerste nog te veel de nostalgie, vanaf de stukken over zijn jeugd en zijn werkende leven aan King's College en in Amerika analyseert hij meer en is hij ook op een boeiende manier kritisch. Ook al zegt hij sociaaldemocraat te zijn, ik zie toch ook veel van een liberaal in hem, maar dan een intellectuele liberaal, niet een van de geldliberalen die we vandaag al te veel zien opduiken. Hij probeert zoveel mogelijk denkruimte te maken voor de mens, bijvoorbeeld om anders te mogen denken over zijn eigen jood-zijn: "Het jodendom is voor mij gevoeligheid voor collectieve zelfbevraging en het vertellen van ongemakkelijke waarheden, dat dafka-[=dwarsligger]achtige talent voor pijnlijkheid en verschil van mening waar we ooit om bekend stonden."
Naar het einde waagt hij zich aan een blik in de toekomst. Zo schrijft de zelfverklaarde kosmopoliet in 2010:
In het eerste deel over zijn kindertijd overheerste nog te veel de nostalgie, vanaf de stukken over zijn jeugd en zijn werkende leven aan King's College en in Amerika analyseert hij meer en is hij ook op een boeiende manier kritisch. Ook al zegt hij sociaaldemocraat te zijn, ik zie toch ook veel van een liberaal in hem, maar dan een intellectuele liberaal, niet een van de geldliberalen die we vandaag al te veel zien opduiken. Hij probeert zoveel mogelijk denkruimte te maken voor de mens, bijvoorbeeld om anders te mogen denken over zijn eigen jood-zijn: "Het jodendom is voor mij gevoeligheid voor collectieve zelfbevraging en het vertellen van ongemakkelijke waarheden, dat dafka-[=dwarsligger]achtige talent voor pijnlijkheid en verschil van mening waar we ooit om bekend stonden."
Naar het einde waagt hij zich aan een blik in de toekomst. Zo schrijft de zelfverklaarde kosmopoliet in 2010:
Ik vermoed dat we aan de vooravond van moeilijke tijden staan. Het zijn niet alleen de terroristen, de bankiers en het klimaat die ons gevoel voor veiligheid en stabiliteit zullen vernietigen. De globalisering zelf, die 'platte' aarde uit zoveel irenische fantasieën, zal voor miljarden mensen een bron van angst en onzekerheid zijn, en zij zullen zich voor bescherming tot hun leiders wenden. Naarmate de behoeftigen en de ontwortelden van Delhi tot Dallas harder op de steeds hogere muren van de omheinde woongemeenschappen roffelen, zullen 'identiteiten' verachtelijk en beklemmend worden.
'Deens', 'Italiaans', 'Amerikaans' of 'Europees' zal dan meer dan een identiteit zijn, het zal een afwijzing en een verwijt zijn aan het adres van degenen die het buitensluit. De staat gaat allesbehalve verdwijnen, maar zal wellicht juist opbloeien. De privileges van het staatsburgerschap en de bescherming van hen die over een verblijfsvergunning beschikken zullen als politieke overwinningen worden gepresenteerd. In gevestigde democratieën zullen intolerante demagogen 'toetsen' – van kennis, taal en houding – eisen om vast te stellen of wanhopige nieuwkomers de Britse, Nederlandse of Franse 'identiteit' waard zijn. Dat gebeurt al. We zullen ze in deze heerlijke nieuwe eeuw nog missen, de toleranten en de marginalen, de randfiguren. Mijn mensen.
December 23, 2023
Мені часом шкода, що не маю доброї пам'яті. Може тому з таким задоволенням читаю чиїсь спогади. Шале пам'яті Тоні Джадта принесло мені чимало задоволення. Від відчуття цінності власного життя автора, від того, з якою уважністю від перебирає спогади, відкриваючи їх одне по одному. І водночас пронизує співчуттям. Книга, яка спонукає цінувати нібито прості, але такі важливі речі — рух, буття поруч з близькими, можливість тамувати цікавість...
Неспішна і вдумлива книга.
Неспішна і вдумлива книга.
June 28, 2017
I usually don't write reviews, but..
Nostalgy for something you never experienced is a curious feeling. This book tells us about a world that has dissappeared. A world of arrogant French intellectuals debating abstract theories and declaring that everything must be destroyed before it can be built again. A world of old-school university teachers who didn't seem to give a damn whether their students are following them or not. A world of lenghty discussions, very erudite and very irresponsible about the latest intellectual trends. A world where it was taken for granted everyone in higher education knows the Western Canon. A world where the most gifted students would choose careers in the academia or the administration over investment banks. A world of the welfare state, of trade unions and mass politics. Finally, a world of something as exciting as the sexual revolution which ironically signalled the inevitable end of the era.
It was also a world of casual racism, a world of casual sexism. A world where homosexuality did not exist. A world where students could seriously support some of the most horrible dictatorships of history. A world where to proclaim the greatness of the Chinese cultural revolution was trendy. A world where white old men were the norm and few questioned it. A world where individuality was frowned upon and in the conflict between individuality and security, security was preferred to the point of dullness and homogeneity. A world where something as ridiculous as Paris -68 could seem important while students who claimed to be communists ignored what was going on in Prague, or indeed called those who really were fighting for real liberty revisionistic traitors.
Thus was the world of post-war modernity . For me to feel nostalgic about it is indulgent and privileged. Much has become better after that. But it was also a world of certainty, of the belief in progress, of the idea that intellectual discussion and ideas in themselves matter. That the world will improve and we humans know how to do that. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. May the arrogance never be back. But sometimes one can't help hoping that we did not know what we know now, no matter how indulgent and selfish such a thought is.
Nostalgy for something you never experienced is a curious feeling. This book tells us about a world that has dissappeared. A world of arrogant French intellectuals debating abstract theories and declaring that everything must be destroyed before it can be built again. A world of old-school university teachers who didn't seem to give a damn whether their students are following them or not. A world of lenghty discussions, very erudite and very irresponsible about the latest intellectual trends. A world where it was taken for granted everyone in higher education knows the Western Canon. A world where the most gifted students would choose careers in the academia or the administration over investment banks. A world of the welfare state, of trade unions and mass politics. Finally, a world of something as exciting as the sexual revolution which ironically signalled the inevitable end of the era.
It was also a world of casual racism, a world of casual sexism. A world where homosexuality did not exist. A world where students could seriously support some of the most horrible dictatorships of history. A world where to proclaim the greatness of the Chinese cultural revolution was trendy. A world where white old men were the norm and few questioned it. A world where individuality was frowned upon and in the conflict between individuality and security, security was preferred to the point of dullness and homogeneity. A world where something as ridiculous as Paris -68 could seem important while students who claimed to be communists ignored what was going on in Prague, or indeed called those who really were fighting for real liberty revisionistic traitors.
Thus was the world of post-war modernity . For me to feel nostalgic about it is indulgent and privileged. Much has become better after that. But it was also a world of certainty, of the belief in progress, of the idea that intellectual discussion and ideas in themselves matter. That the world will improve and we humans know how to do that. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. May the arrogance never be back. But sometimes one can't help hoping that we did not know what we know now, no matter how indulgent and selfish such a thought is.
July 7, 2011
I have such mixed feelings about this book - but I am not sure whether some of those are not mixed feelings about my own motivations in choosing to read the book. He lays his cards on the table from the beginning, describing with a cool bitterness exactly what it means to have ALS. Judt's was an interesting life, shorter than it should have been, and he moves with ease between his secular Jewish upbringing in Putney, why he learned Czech, his time as a kibbutzim, driving across America and plenty more. I found the book a very engaging, intellectually satisfying yet easy read.
Yet I was also uncomfortable. A little voice kept saying to me that too much of this was Grumpy Old Men (as per TV series) rendered respectable, given gravitas, by tragedy and a forceful intellect (or way with words - he does write about whether articulacy and intelligence are the same thing).
When he writes about the current English secondary school system, he sounds remarkably like a Daily Telegraph-dependent ex-pat. Grains, maybe even the odd boulder of truth, but for a thoughtful historian a very lazy-seeming set of easy unoriginal generalisations which made me wonder about the other commentaries which lack of knowledge forces me to take at face value. There were a number of other instances of a similar nature, for example, when he talks about an elderly Swiss lady upbraiding him for putting his foot up on the opposite train seat and adds that by contrast no one in the UK would notice or care. Be too reticent or even, sadly, intimidated, yes but elderly (or honestly barely middle-aged) English women not notice or care?
Ultimately, it doesn't really matter what I think or whether some of the observations are not all that fresh, or just not shared - if the exercise of generating this book gave a quantum of solace to Judt's lonely, immobile nights, that's enough. And as I did enjoy it, that's more than enough.
Yet I was also uncomfortable. A little voice kept saying to me that too much of this was Grumpy Old Men (as per TV series) rendered respectable, given gravitas, by tragedy and a forceful intellect (or way with words - he does write about whether articulacy and intelligence are the same thing).
When he writes about the current English secondary school system, he sounds remarkably like a Daily Telegraph-dependent ex-pat. Grains, maybe even the odd boulder of truth, but for a thoughtful historian a very lazy-seeming set of easy unoriginal generalisations which made me wonder about the other commentaries which lack of knowledge forces me to take at face value. There were a number of other instances of a similar nature, for example, when he talks about an elderly Swiss lady upbraiding him for putting his foot up on the opposite train seat and adds that by contrast no one in the UK would notice or care. Be too reticent or even, sadly, intimidated, yes but elderly (or honestly barely middle-aged) English women not notice or care?
Ultimately, it doesn't really matter what I think or whether some of the observations are not all that fresh, or just not shared - if the exercise of generating this book gave a quantum of solace to Judt's lonely, immobile nights, that's enough. And as I did enjoy it, that's more than enough.
December 27, 2011
It's a very moving and beautifully written series of memoirs which he wrote as he was dying of ALS, and revisiting his life was essentially the only thing he could do to occupy his time. But it is totally without self-pity, he says at one point “loss is loss and there no sense in making it nicer”
As someone who wasn't brought up Jewish, there are many places that I could identify with his experiences and his observations are so spot-on that I kept saying to myself, yes, that's exactly what I would have wanted to say if I was able to think and write so clearly!
As someone who wasn't brought up Jewish, there are many places that I could identify with his experiences and his observations are so spot-on that I kept saying to myself, yes, that's exactly what I would have wanted to say if I was able to think and write so clearly!
Read
November 22, 2022Подібні книги викликають мадленковий синдром, суміш сентиментальності, меланхолії та ностальгії. Не має значення, що досвід автора може не мати нічого спільного з досвідом читача, достатньо мати пам’ять й здолати принаймні пів путі життя земного. Намагаюся таки книжки оминати, бо якщо почнеш читати вже не зупинишся.
July 15, 2011
Goodreads' custom of using the text from the inside of the front hardcover dust-jacket as their summary goes awry here by leaving out a critical fact (which is on the back cover): Tony Judt wrote this book while in the terminal stages of ALS (also known as Lou Gehrig's disease), a neuro-degenerative disorder that progressively paralyses the sufferer's body while leaving the mind totally untouched. Most people who get it die within a couple of years, usually of suffocation, or of complications due to immobility or lung disfunction. It is for now incurable and untreatable. Essentially, as Judt says, it is a life sentence in which you are imprisoned in your own body.
Now, you might be thinking Dr. Johnson's Dog here, but you'd be wrong. This is a good little memoir independent of the fact that Judt had advanced ALS while he wrote it. Not tremendously profound, but nevertheless with Interesting observations and insights, and successful (it seems to me) in giving one a feel for what it was that made him such an important voice. No, the reason why it is critical to mention ALS in the summary is two-fold: first, because it explains both the title and the genesis of the book, and second, because it contains as devastating and as brave a first-person description of a fatal disease as I have come across. It is worth getting the book just to read the chapter entitled "Night".
Perhaps it means more to me than it will to most people. My father has treated patients with ALS, and been active in research to understand how ALS develops and how it might be cured, for forty years. I've spoken with him about ALS, I've read research papers on it, I've even written software to help predict the likely timeline for a patient, and yet not until I read Judt's description of what it is like to have ALS did I really understand what a terrible disease it is. The stuff of nightmares... even if you don't have claustrophobia. And out of the horror comes this calm, measured book. Respect, Tony, deep respect. I'll be reading your other books.
Now, you might be thinking Dr. Johnson's Dog here, but you'd be wrong. This is a good little memoir independent of the fact that Judt had advanced ALS while he wrote it. Not tremendously profound, but nevertheless with Interesting observations and insights, and successful (it seems to me) in giving one a feel for what it was that made him such an important voice. No, the reason why it is critical to mention ALS in the summary is two-fold: first, because it explains both the title and the genesis of the book, and second, because it contains as devastating and as brave a first-person description of a fatal disease as I have come across. It is worth getting the book just to read the chapter entitled "Night".
Perhaps it means more to me than it will to most people. My father has treated patients with ALS, and been active in research to understand how ALS develops and how it might be cured, for forty years. I've spoken with him about ALS, I've read research papers on it, I've even written software to help predict the likely timeline for a patient, and yet not until I read Judt's description of what it is like to have ALS did I really understand what a terrible disease it is. The stuff of nightmares... even if you don't have claustrophobia. And out of the horror comes this calm, measured book. Respect, Tony, deep respect. I'll be reading your other books.
December 12, 2017
Překvapivě dobré, zvláště pasáže se vzpomínkami na dětství. Chvíli mě dráždily jeho názory politické, ale pak mi došlo, že to podává upřímně, toho si cením, i když s ním třeba nesouhlasím. Nemarné čtení.
October 14, 2024
Great essays from a great mind.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 307 reviews