What do you think?
Rate this book


136 pages, Kindle Edition
First published May 1, 2011
Akiko pointed out a series of anamorphoses and their cylindrical mirrors. Painted on paper, they were incomprehensible, an ugly spill of color. But when one looked at their reflections on the curved surfaces of the mirrors, they became fully visible. And they were erotic. Shamelessly so. They were beautiful and they were obscene. I am like these.The netsuke which epitomizes tenderness, beauty and utility, can also contract streaks of devilish germs if not placed in the proper menagerie under the right lighting. Although the collection of physical netsuke that Akiko presents her husband, stands helpless witness to his clandestine sessions of copulation, the metaphoric netsuke is none other than Akiko herself. Like the collection, she is beautiful and tender, glazed and precious; but like the collection, she is admired from afar, imprisoned in her body and traded for better pieces. And in her mute, equanimous stupor, she opens her palms and lets slip the jewels that were holding her dazzle among all other netsuke.


Netsuke. I am a huge fan of Ducornet and was thrilled to win this book from LibraryThing. I was also very fearful: it can be nerve-wracking to review someone who is an accomplished author not to mention the fear of "what if I don't like it?"He considers the nature of women. The daisies of the field, so fuckable, so breakable. The ones who call out Hey! and stamp their feet in irritation, like mares. The ones who blossom early, only to succumb to nerves. Those who startle easily and sour in an instant; love with them is like sucking lemons. The lazy, careless women in need of pedicures, who, when darkness falls, can be seen lolling about, unkempt, in tapas bars. The aging actresses, their sweet vulnerabilities on parade. Incandescent alcoholics as troublesome as fever dreams, fantastic in the early hours of the evening, but only then. The chameleons. The gorgeous exotics prone to outbursts of temper. The luscious North Africans, their balaclava pussies. The antelope who cannot settle down—a good fuck on an airplane, taxicab, the train. The new mistresses one fucks before sitting down to dinner with one's wife. The women who give courage (these are rare). The wild ones with magenta manes who wear boots in all seasons. The whore who brought down Enkidu, who showed him the things a woman knows how to do. The tribal types who like sex in clusters. The women who, at Christmas, consider suicide. The frisky ones. The ones who talk too much. The ones who kill with silence. The risk takers. The ones with Big Ideas. The death cunts who kill with a look. The tender ones, the Feyaways, like islands, who love in cautious isolation, who rub one's feet; they have juicers. One abandons them judiciously, all the while cooing like a dove. The clients whom one fucks in the name of a Unique Experiment. The wives whom one betrays, extravagantly. The current wife: Akiko. The one for whom the interstices were superseded, if only briefly, by the Real. Akiko. Whose beauty no longer troubles his sleep. (His world is mazed with counts and he has not yearned for her in centuries.)This quotation alone give us three pieces of evidence that this is experimental fiction, concerned less with verisimilitude or didacticism than with language and emotion (with "the truth of the human heart," as Hawthorne put it in one of American literature's early manifestoes for a non-realist literature):
An old Prince of Darkness—this is what he has become. His teeth worn to the gums, his tongue swollen with overuse, his cock, like his heart, close to breaking. (italics in original)
The thrilling rotating doors. Their highly polished brass. And everywhere the smell of women. A rich perfume almost overwhelming. I may have sneezed. The smell of powder so rare these days and perfumes rosier than now. Far sweeter, far too redolent of mothers and their sisters and friends and yet intoxicating—as was Loll's invisible bosom, weighty as a watermelon.Eventually, the narrator meets his ultimate lover, a man named David Swancourt, also known as a woman named Jello. (Ducornet, with whatever psychological aptness, seems to portray David/Jello not as a transgender woman—i. e., an integral self with a gender identity that may not align with social identity—but as a man with multiple personalities, a male self and a female self in one body.) David too is a sensitive and fragile psyche seeking a feminine interior for himself ("Lovely Anna Morphosis," "A woman coiled within a man the way a cock coils upon itself within a pair of silk panties"). The novel thus suggests that male sexual obsession and predation is both a revenge on femininity for being unattainable and a desperate attempt to return to the source of the feminine self in every man—as the narrator puts it, he "take[s] his war back to the womb."
There we were. It was a palace devoted to women's clothing. Not a cookie in sight. Only the infinite air, a female ocean. My mother brayed: Look at his stupid face!—her laughter bouncing off the countertops like spheres of glass. It was a lesson, one of many. In this way I was trained to despise all my dreams.
Her Minotaur's sex is scandalously large, gorged with blood, striking Eve's thigh. His balls, dark as plums, quiver beneath. If Eve is aroused, creamy, her sex is folded into itself, hidden. Only the cleft, like the mark on a plum, is visible.The vulvic involutions that manifest hiddenness: the ability to be and to be hidden, to show forth and to conceal. An image of the aesthetic, the aesthetic, which the narrator disclaims any interest in, pledging his allegiance to its opposite in the practices of men, including psychoanalysis and religion:
The infant…will become a hoodlum, a maniac, a soldier; he will become a priest, a prison guard, a cop. A dogmatist, a patriarch—decidedly a public danger. He will become a psychoanalyst. He will have a Practice.To the extent the novel itself contains (i. e., minotaur-mazes) this monster, who is only a latent possibility of the human male, within the boundaries of the aesthetic—a Japanese aesthetic at that—it may be read as Akiko's revenge, the woman's and non-westerner's revenge, at the level of form, for the narrator's ugly but socially-sanctioned transgressions.
They keep me on my toes.Maybe each cliche, like "the land of milk and honey," contains an embedded utopia to which Ducornet is trying to draw our attention, sometimes by slightly altering the cliche or using it in an unfamiliar context; or perhaps Ducornet is intimating that Akiko, for whom English is a second language, is really our narrator, trying out her facility with the American idiom (lending credence to this idea, the narrative does occasionally enter the third person and proceed from the viewpoints of characters other than the main narrator); but if so, this is one experiment that seems to me to fail. There is moreover a whole character—Kat, called "the Cutter" by the narrator due to her pathology—who seems to be a cliche; even if she wanted to do something new with the paradoxically eroticized figure of self-harming female fragility, Ducornet does not spend enough time with Kat to accomplish it. (Also, the narrator and the Cutter watch snuff films—plural—together, whereas I thought snuff films were an urban legend.) All in all, I know the novel is the husband's story, but I would have liked to hear more about Akiko: she is the novel's most interesting, if not most extreme, character.
They like it down and dirty.
Her sex was like a beacon at the end of a tunnel…
She has a temper hot enough to fry an egg.
…a life lived leaping from one frying pan into another.
He likes what he sees in the mirror. He can pull this off.
Both of them clinging like glue.
…fucking like beasts on the floor.
It's a risky business.