William Styron (1925–2006), born in Newport News, Virginia, was one of the greatest American writers of his generation. Styron published his first book, Lie Down in Darkness, at age twenty-six and went on to write such influential works as the controversial and Pulitzer Prize–winning The Confessions of Nat Turner and the international bestseller Sophie’s Choice.
Long march, short book. I wonder if it’s unfashionable to read Styron these days, noting just one of my GR friends have read this. Or maybe it has other issues: because it’s a war book and who hasn’t read enough of them?
But this one’s different. It has two clear themes running through it. One is war and the army and we hear all the things we expect to. War’s bad. Even if you aren’t actually there, just training. But entwined in this story is the one about a type of person and a type of relationship. It’s told as the colonel vs the honest, cynical captain, who is determined to win his personal battle with the colonel by forcing his not competent for the exercise men to get through the long march imposed on them. But it could be any boss with any employee, it’s a story you see every day, the one where the boss is a sort of bully who catches the employee in that attitude of okay, I’m going to do every fucking unreasonable thing you tell me to and that’s going to make me the winner. But the incredibly sad truth is, it doesn’t make the employee the winner. It makes the employer the winner and to make matters worse, he doesn’t even care. He doesn’t even really notice that he’s won. And yet it is so hard not to engage, even though the bully triumphs whatever you do.
This is a marvellous book about such a heroic character who can’t win. It is beautifully told, takes a couple of hours to read. Throughout I had a picture in my head of who would be in the movie. George Rossi. Perfect.
“The Long March” is a short book – a *really* short book. This novella by one of the leading modern Southern U.S. writers is only 84 pages long – and I enjoyed it, even if I detected a disconnect between William Styron’s lushly descriptive writing style and the stripped-down quality of the book’s basic storyline.
Styron came from Newport News, Virginia, a shipbuilding community that became the fictional “Port Warwick” of his first novel, Lie Down in Darkness (1951). When Lie Down in Darkness won the prestigious Prix de Rome, Styron was immediately catapulted into the front rank of major U.S. writers of the post-World War II era, and the pressure for him to produce a strong follow-up was no doubt considerable. The Long March (1952), with its sheer brevity, no doubt surprised some readers who may have been expecting something larger in scope.
In his fiction, Styron always drew quite directly upon his life experience; and The Long March looks back to Styron’s time in the United States Marine Corps. Having begun his college career at Davidson College, Styron transferred to Duke University so that he could enroll in an officer-training program; he graduated with the rank of lieutenant, but never saw action in the Second World War because of the Imperial Japanese surrender. He was, however, recalled to service with the U.S. Marines after the Korean War began, and his period of training at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, seems to have inspired The Long March.
This novella begins on a grim note: “One noon, in the blaze of a cloudless Carolina summer, what was left of eight dead boys lay strewn about the landscape, among the poison ivy and the pine needles and loblolly saplings” (p. 1). These eight dead Marines are the victims of errant mortar fire from a live-fire exercise gone wrong – the rounds fell short and struck a group of Marines that had queued up in the chow line at mealtime – and the novel’s main character, a lieutenant named Culver, is thoroughly horrified by the death and physical mayhem inflicted by these weapons of war.
Culver, like Styron, is a lieutenant who finished his World War II training too late to fight the Imperial Japanese, but has been recalled to military service because of the Korean War. He is not happy about this summons back to duty – he has a good life with his wife and family back in New York City – and just as unhappy is his best friend in the unit, Captain Mannix. And neither Culver nor Mannix is happy with the way the unit’s commander, Colonel Templeton, responds to the calamity that has taken the lives of eight U.S. Marines.
Alright, let’s engage in a thought exercise about command responsibilities. You’re a colonel in the United States Marine Corps. Eight men under your command have just been killed in a mortar-fire accident. What do you do? It occurs to me that, for example, you might start an official investigation – to find out exactly how this tragedy occurred, so that nothing of the kind could ever happen again. Or perhaps you might organize a memorial service on behalf of all those dead Marines, who were killed by mortar fire in the Korean War era without ever having seen a Korean battlefield.
But not Colonel Templeton. Sir, no, sir! Lieutenant Culver and Captain Mannix learn that Colonel Templeton has ordered that his Marines undertake a 36-mile hike, on grounds that some Marines in his unit have been “doping off” and need the march to restore discipline. Thirty-six miles – about the distance from the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., to the Inner Harbor of Baltimore. The Colonel insists that this is not a “punishment march,” but merely a way to reinforce Marine discipline. No one believes him.
Culver reflects on the disquiet that this news has caused, for both him and Captain Mannix:
Then it occurred to him that he was actually terrified of the march, of the thirty-six miles: not because of the length – which was beyond comprehension – but because he was sure he’d not be able to make it. The contagion of Mannix’s fear had touched him. And he wondered then if Mannix’s fear had been like his own: that no matter what his hatred of the system, of the Marine Corps, might be, some instilled, twisted pride would make him walk until he dropped, and his fear was not of the hike itself, but of dropping. (pp. 25-26)
Microaggressions abound, as, beneath the strict protocol of military manners, the reader senses the hostility between Colonel Templeton and Captain Mannix. Mannix is in charge of the Headquarters & Service (H & S) Company, and Templeton has suggested, oh so gently, that H & S may be a relatively “soft” component within the unit. What does H & S have to do with live mortar rounds falling on eight U.S. Marines in a chow line? You got me. But the Colonel’s orders for a march are followed, while Culver watches the dynamic between Mannix and Templeton grow steadily worse.
The march begins, and Culver is appalled to see the pace that Colonel Templeton is setting:
It was the pace of a trained hiker – determined, unhesitant, much closer to a trot now than a walk – and only a few minutes passed before Culver was gasping for breath. Sand lay thick in the road, hindering a natural step. They had not gone more than a couple of hundred yards; already he felt sweat trickling down his forehead and beneath his arms. For a moment fear surged up in him unnaturally, and a crazy panic. He had been afraid of the march before, but his fear had been abstract and hazy; now so quickly fatigued, in what seemed a matter of seconds, he felt surely (as Mannix had predicted) that he’d be unable to last the first hour. A panicky wash of blood came to his face and he struggled for breath, wanting to cry out… (pp. 50-51).
Captain Mannix meanwhile exhibits an almost Captain Ahab-like determination to show the Colonel that he can make the march, and make his men make the march. A nail in Mannix’s boot is causing his foot to bleed, but Mannix angrily rejects Templeton’s suggestions that he ride in one of the trucks that are accompanying the march to pick up any Marines who fall out. He rides his men unmercifully, more harshly than any other officer in the unit, determined that every one of his Marines will complete the march.
By the end of the march, the reader has a vivid sense of the toll that the march has taken on Mannix, as Culver beholds with horror what has happened to his friend and fellow officer over those 36 miles:
He watched Mannix walk with an awful hobbling motion up the road, face screwed up in pain and eyes asquint like a man trying to gaze at the sun. He moved at a good rate of speed, but his gait was terrible to behold – jerks and spasms which warded off, reacted to, or vainly tried to control great zones and areas of pain. Behind him, most of his men lay in stupefied rows at the edge of the road and waited for the trucks to come. They knew Mannix had finished, and they had crumpled completely. For the last ten minutes, in a listless fashion, he had assembled less than a third of the company who were willing to continue the march – die-hards, athletes, and just those who, like Mannix himself, would make the last six miles out of pride and spite. Out of fury. (p. 75)
The reader then waits for what, it seems, will be an inevitable final confrontation between Captain Mannix and Colonel Templeton, and wonders what shape that confrontation will take.
I found The Long March to be a rather curious book. In other Styron books that are more comprehensive in scope – not just Lie Down in Darkness, but also other works like The Confessions of Nat Turner (1967) and Sophie’s Choice (1979) – Styron’s use of long, flowing periodic sentences filled with lush description seems fitting. These stylistic features have long been characteristic of Southern U.S. literature, and they reflect Styron’s lifelong admiration for his literary hero Thomas Wolfe (remember that Stingo, the aspiring writer in Sophie’s Choice, is always carrying with him a copy of Wolfe’s novel Look Homeward, Angel).
In an 84-page novella, by contrast, I found that there was a disconnect between the book’s epic, Faulknerian sentence structure and its limited scope. Nonetheless, The Long March is an interesting example of Styron’s literary art, and it builds suspense well as Colonel Templeton’s march goes on and on and on.
Brilliant writing as always. Not only for the Styron completist; it's a great starting point for any lover of flawless descriptive prose that has the fluidity and ease of water moving downwards with the force of gravity.
Brutal account of life as a reservist US Marine in the 1950s tearing through some of the romanticism of the time, and painting a vivid picture of characters despite being set over a single day and a half.
The standard military route march is 24 km (I’ve done one), the one in this novel is more like sixty. It is brutal, punishing, and one way or another it will break the toughest of men. Styron gets inside the process to demonstrate that old maxim – pride goes before the fall.
The more I read of Styron, the more I enjoy. His language is simply sublime. The rhythm, the description, even in novels like this that are not necessarily "Southern" in subject, are nevertheless Southern in nature. And his ability to create character, whether it's Nat Turner or Milton Loftis in Lie Down in Darkness or the raging Captain Al Mannix in this novel, is beyond compare (except in Faulkner of course). While this novel was not as compelling as Nat Turner, I still found it an enjoyable afternoon read.
Much more than a short novel about a long march. Like much modern great war literature it dissects free will vs submission when intelligent soldiers encounter incomprehensible authority.
William Styron is the author of one of my all-time favorite books, SOPHIE’S CHOICE, and if you ever get the chance to read it, you’re in for a huge treat. THE LONG MARCH, unfortunately, didn’t sit as well with me. At about 90 pages, it’s really a novella, and one that feels flat and, ultimately, predictable.
The story follows an overnight, 36-mile forced march back to base at a U.S. Marine training camp in the Carolinas. The main characters are Lt. Culver and his friend, Capt. Mannix. Just before the march begins, the soldiers learn that a training mishap has resulted in the deaths of eight other Marines. That tragedy hangs over the first half of the book and reinforces Culver and Mannix’s belief that the impending march is an unimportant farce.
As always with Styron, I marveled at his use of language, particularly his mastery of vocabulary. I read this as an e-book and appreciated being able to define words as they appeared on the page (“adumbration,” anyone?) without needing to stop and look them up. But in the end, there just isn’t much here beyond the prose. The arc feels telegraphed, and the closing scene felt ineffectual and unnecessary.
I went both ways on this book, so that's why I chose a 3. It was real, intense and I felt like I was there. But at the same time, it was confusing with the conversations and characters. I didn't know where it was headed and to tell the truth, I was glad when it ended.
I picked this up after reading the first page and because, quite frankly, I can’t help buying books. Yes, it might be a little bit overworked at times as one reviewer said, but I loved the rhythm of the sentences and the vivid portrayal of main characters. It was slim and narrow in focus, yet I was drawn into the world as if it was an epic.
So far, my enjoyability statistics with Styron are 50/50. Absolutely LOVED Sophie's Choice, Nat Turner, and Lie Down in Darkness. But Darkness Visible, Tidewater Morning and now The Long March were sadly wastes of time in my humble opinion. If you were ever in the military during peacetime, you might recognize a few character traits here and there, but so what? That means he only did some recollection or some research. For a better story about men being pushed beyond the breaking point, I'd recommend Bridge Over the River Kwai.
Note: I read a stand-alone Long March in a paperback format from the 1970s which is not available for review on goodreads, so I have no opinion about The Clap Shack.
This is one of the first books I ever fell in love with. Granted I picked it because it was approved for my college lit class and was very short. If I would have picked another author I probably would not have rekindled my love for reading. What can I say Awsome little book that touches to boundries of insanity lol.
In these few pages, Styron evokes a fully rounded world, that of aging soldiers called back into service for the Korean War. The lead character, Culver, had been settling into comfortable civilian life after WWII when he was called back from the Marine reserves. The story is nominally about how soft he has become in the past six years. He is worried that he won't be able to finish a thirty-mile training march.
But it's not just that his body has gotten older and a little flabbier. The real issue is about a person's evolving self-identity. "[Culver] was no longer an eager kid just out of Quantico with a knife between his teeth. He was almost thirty, he was old, and he was afraid" (p.3).
Culver's fellow officer, Mannix, does not admit his doubts. He swears he is still a hard-as-nails Marine, dammit, and he completes the long march with bleeding feet just to prove he can. He needs to continue drinking the military Kool-aid because he is even more afraid than Culver is. Mannix is afraid that if he is not an archetypal Marine, he is nobody.
The commander, Templeton, is the third main character in this tale. Why does he insist on the long march? And does he walk the walk, or does he take a jeep for some of it? That is left deliberately ambiguous because from the soldiers' point of view, a commander is an ambiguous mix of ordinary man and superhuman figure.
I'm not a huge fan of the novella form because it must rely on narrative exposition rather than dramatic action (telling rather than showing). That's a style of writing that was much more common up to the mid-twentieth-century. It is out of favor today, and not surprisingly, so is the novella. Nevertheless, within the constraints of that style, The Long March stands out as one of the great ones.
Styron, William (1952). The Long March. New York: Bantam, 84pp.
A novella that manages to capture in 80 pages the eternal conflict in the Marine Corps between reservists and regulars...has not changed in the 60 years between the Korean era in which this tale was set and OIF.
Long before William Styron became famous for The Confessions of Nat Turner (1967) and Sophie's Choice (1979) he wrote a slim fiction about Marine Corps reserves re-training to be deployed to Korea. The Long March (1952) is slender, barely a novella, and a bit of a puzzle even after all the pieces are put in order.
Opening with a gruesome description of eight dead marines, caught at camp-breakfast by live-fire short-rounds, stopping briefly at one of those dreaded training lectures with lights out and seat-mates snoring, the main part of the story is, indeed, a long march. It’s in mid-summer in 1950s (North) Carolina. Despite the death of men in the neighboring battalion, Lieutenant Colonel Templeton — “a man to whom the greatest embarrassment would be a show of emotion”– is determined to take his men on a brutal 36 mile, all-night, hike. (At the regulation 2 1/2 miles an hour that is almost 15 hours; forced). “The Battalion’s been doping off,” he says. The men need some esprit.
...
Most readers take from the story a view of anti-militarism and American complaint about conformity. “”None of this Hemingway crap for me, Jack,” says Mannix. What I read, however, is in a certain sense, a recruiting story: men pushed to the limit, and beyond, become men. Despite “despising” the Corps, Mannix responds as it intends him to do. The courts-martial tempting outburst in the lecture does not stir rebellion. No argument is brought forward against injury to so many men. The anger is directed not obviously to the colonel, or any higher-ups, but a) against themselves, and b) against those subordinate to them. In a perfect example of the latest discoveries of male testosterone, its increase in middle status apes does not turn them against their superior tormentors, but much more brutally against their own subordinates. As has long been said in the military, “all shit runs down hill.”
Pitch perfect prose. An easy read because the singular event of the title is the only action. Your mind cannot wander because the events are elaborated and explored until the lemon has given up all its juice. It's as if Styron's written a paragraph for each step of the journey. You go through it with the soldiers. The ultimate irony is that at a certain point the journey I was taking as a reader started to seem pointless. Where was I going and why? At the end, I wondered why I'd begun. This pointlessness mimics the experience of the soldiers, but I guess I wanted more -- some resolution, some sense of climax, some sort of orgasm. I guess I wanted more of the following: Mannix was "a mass of scars" from war wounds. "But underneath his rebellion Culver knew Mannix -- like all of them -- was really resigned. Born into a generation of conformists, even Mannix was aware that his gestures were not symbolic, but individual, therefore hopeless, maybe even absurd, and that he was trapped like all of them in a predicament which one personal insurrection could, if anything, only make worse. 'You know,' he said once, 'I think I was really afraid just one time last war.' The phrase 'last war' had had, itself, a numb, resigned quality, in its lack of any particular inflection, like 'last weekend', or 'last movie I went to see'"(39). "He was not man enough to crap out, not man enough to disavow all his determination and endurance and suffering. He was not man enough, far less simply a free man; he was just a marine and would go on being a marine forever. The corruption begun years ago in his drill feet had climbed up, overtaken him, and begun to rot his brain" (74-5). This is a tragic book (not in any obvious ways) and a good one.
The Long March is one of William Styron’s masterpieces. It is a perfect indictment of the psychological impact of the military on people. Mannix, a Marine captain, sets himself in a training exercise against his superior officer, Colonel Templeton. Mannix believes that Templeton’s motives are punitive and idiotic. He also believes that Templeton is a hypocrite who will not subject himself to the hardships of his men in the training exercise – a long, hot, ridiculously long march.
Mannix cannot let himself admit that he has been beaten. “The old atavism that clutched them, the voice that commanded, once again, you will. How stupid to think they had ever made their own philosophy; it was as puny as a house of straw, and at this moment—by the noise in their brains of those words, you will—it was being blasted to the winds like dust. They were as helpless as children. Another war, and years beyond reckoning, had violated their minds irrevocably. For six years they had slept a cataleptic sleep, dreaming blissfully of peace, awakened in horror to find that, after all, they were only marines, responding anew to the old commands. They were marines.” The question is why? This novel is a darkly comic tragedy. One can see easily that this scenario has repeated itself many times over. That Templeton turns out to be an honorable representation of a Colonel and Mannix is incorrect only makes it that much more tragic. Mannix no longer needed the military in his life, but he still was not capable of leaving it behind. This is a great book.
Mr. Styron wrote an excellent novella describing the scenes in so much detail you feel the dust, heat and oppression of the day. In the end you know the people. You feel what Mannix feels. If you have been in a similar situation you are able to see the dust, hear the insects and feel the sting of their bite. Few authors today portray the depth and detail this novella includes.
This is the first book I've read by Styron. He is an outstanding writer. "The Long March" is somewhat biographical mirroring his tenure in the USMC. while his writing was excellent, the story was only so so. The long foot march as an exercise depicted in the book was very typical of some of the totally ill considered activities the military can dream up to make the troops miserable in the name of "conditioning". As you will read in the book, rebelling against such exercises will get you no where but maybe a court martial.
Une nouvelle extraite de A tombeau ouvert, parfaite pour les lectures de trajets. Une nouvelle touchante et drôle qui raconte la rencontre de l'auteur avec le lieutenant-colonel Mariott du corps des Marines. Quelque chose de léger qui se lit facilement mais qui nous transporte rapidement dans l'univers de Marines se préparant à la guerre de Corée. Cette nouvelle m'a permis de découvrir William Styron. Dans son écriture j'ai vu du cynisme à la Capot et de la chaleur poisse à la Faulkner. J'ai envie d'aller plus loin afin de me faire une idée plus précise.
Read this very quickly-- line by line an excellent meditation on the inanity of war. The narrator, who survived WWII and remained in the Marines as a reserve, is called for duty when Korean War breaks out, making his peacetime prosperity seem like a dream. That it takes place under "the Carolina sun" rather than in Korea makes it all the more effective as a study in the pathological absurdity of military exercises.
It made me recall marches like this at USMC infantry training, also in the Carolina sun where, after an hour or so the wrinkle in the bottom of your sock seemed like a razor blade, and the rattle of a loose buckle in your helmet liner like hammer blows. I lack the art to remember them so poetically.
Styron's a fantastic crafter of sentences and situations. I probably would have rated this higher if I'd read it before I read Karl Marlantes' Matterhorn. This is very similar in tone and attitude, but but a very narrow focus. Not bad, but not Matterhorn either. That's an unfair comparison, honestly, but that's what my brain kept going back to as I read this.
If you've never been in the military, and want to better understand the life of a soldier, read this book. For those of us who have been in the military, the theme of the commander's motives make a lot of sense. It's not the full story, though. Joseph Heller can get you caught up on all the catches.
I had some nagging minor complaints about the book but I do enjoy Styron and his style. The opening with dead marines certainly hits the reader with a powerful beginning. And yet, it seems inconceivable that any unit would allow this grueling march in the aftermath of such a tragic accident. I fluctuate between giving the book 3 or 4 stars.
I think there was so much more to say at the end. My problem not being that it is a novella, rather that the end was abrupt and left you looking for the next chapter. I guess I'm always looking to have the end neatly tied up and you will not get this in this book.