Chapter 1: What is statistics?
5/10
Intro chapter. A few comics and then the chapters presented.
Chapter 2: Data description
6/10
I already see how much of this is outdated in the presentation. It’s still readable, but it’s clunky and often I got stuck on words or outdated explanations. Which is kinda an issue as the stats alone are already very complicated for most readers. Why complicate it even more?
The lack of colors is a huge issue actually. The book is way less interesting this way. No character feels alive. Even the lines are incomplete and thick. It’s not really up to par with proper comics, but it’s not bad either. Just painfully mediocre and boring. The cartoon text is silly, but then nothing is funny or daring. Joke characters are just saying silly lines. They really could have pushed it a bit further and added some conflict or spicy jokes at times.
I had to read the stem-and-left page 3-4 times before I got it, again illustrating how far away my mind is from the book. The issue is simple. In the book they present numbers like this: “12 : 0155005”. I just couldn’t figure out what it meant. Then suddenly it hit me. In Excel individual numbers are separated, at minimum, by commas, but I assume back then Excel was not something everyone used. It’s actually: 0, 1, 5, 5, 0, 0, 5. Individual numbers not one single number. My brain just couldn’t see it for some reason and it would have been such an easy job to update the book and add commas and Excel examples.
They also don’t explain things like why you have to take the square root to get the standard deviation. It’s nice they explain what it is, but the math is not explained and just confuses me.
Overall the chapter is fine, but colors and updated terms would make it more interesting.
Chapter 3: Probability
6,5/10
Better in some ways, worse in other ways. It’s a step up in complications and frankly I didn’t really study the formulas because I will likely never have a job where I will use this.
The cartoon characters are better as now we also have 2 historical figures which adds the depth I was asking for. There are also some good explanations using dice to illustrate probabilities. This is a fine enough intro. I actually think this chapter is great for people wanting the basics on probability stats.
Chapter 4: Random variables
5/10
Very math heavy. As I didn’t plan to study the formulas or even understand them unless they were plainly explained this was not really for me. It’s a ton of complicated formulas and my main issue is that they just use math letters so it all looks like a foreing language unless you memorize what every single letter stands for, which again is not really what I personally want to do while reading this book for fun.
The math is simple enough so that I would easily understand it if they just used words instead of symbols. It wouldn't be “proper” math, but it would be beginner friendly this way. If I wanted to understand and memorize all the formulas I’d watch Khan Academy math videos instead as that would make it more simple and direct. Then I’d do some interactive math tests to train my memory. But it wouldn't really work anyhow. When I need to learn a formula to use it for some calculations I learn it in a day. When I need it for an exam or something equally “pointless” it’s 10 times harder.
Chapter 5: A tale of two distributions
4/10
More formulas. This is good info for the right people who crucially need this stuff and already understand complicated algebra math on a high level. For me just wanting the basics it’s a miss. That’s not to say it’s bad. I haven’t even checked out the formulas. This may be some amazing math for all I know.
Chapter 6: Sampling
5/10
Again formula focus. Most formulas are not even applied so I see the formulas, but then don’t really see them in action. There are some okay general points about sampling, but this is just badly explained. There is nothing more to it. It’s not just me not needing the math and therefore skipping it. It’s even just the math now not being fully explained. Rather they just show formulas and then hazily explain what they sorta do. This is impossible for me to fully understand unless I seek out other sources too.
Chapter 7: Confidence intervals
6/10
I like some examples in the book. The dice examples before and now the arrow circles examples. They work really well, unfortunately there are very few of them. Such a comic book should be all about such visual overviews and then the hard stats could be secondary info.
We see a lot of methods to calculate confidence intervals. I’m not sure where each formula works best because they say things like: for small samples use this formula for big samples use this other formula. What is a big sample? I must have missed that. Maybe at the end they could have shown all formulas with names and then also used words for symbols too so that you had a clear overview. My memory is terrible and I can’t remember all this math unless I use it every day for a month.
Chapter 8: Hypothesis testing
2,5/10
Goes into culture war territory and makes some crucial logical errors. Not ideal.
I’m not checking the math itself, but it’s quite telling that the more simple logical arguments have been less than ideal. I noticed quite a few progressive political statements in the book before, but just ignored it because it was just single statements. Here it’s a logical fallacy. They start the chapter by claiming that stats are misused by social science and politicians. Then they use a “racism” example where there are only 4 Black people in a group of 80 while they are 50% of the population. It would be like expecting 50% of nurses to be male and then blame sexism against men for the “unfair” distribution. Which actually is the main way social science misuses stats - something they themselves just called out. They are blindly assuming that both groups are exactly the same biologically, and maybe culturally, and that any difference is caused by the exact discrimination effect they are supporting. It’s like saying fire is hot because it lacks water then as you measure the temperature of fire and prove it’s hot you conclude that your prior hypothesis is proven correct.
Chapter 9: Comparing two populations
5/10
With more and more fallacies and ideological biases appearing and the book really not getting any more interesting I feel like it has overstayed its welcome. Here they go into gender wage differences, in the prior chapter it was racial descrimination against African Americans. They also have a lot of examples about other progressive claims. It’s just a tad too much. It’s starting to feel out of place in a stats book in my opinion.
But that’s not really the main issue at all. The book is just boring, looks unappealing and after a while gets too dry. It’s more formulas and more examples that are in writing instead of being drawings. The drawings are too often just jokes. This chapter for example has 2 creepy weird male characters make fun of math terms with sexual innuendos as 2 attractive, unfairly underpaid, women sigh at them. Instead the jokes and examples should have been like the dice and arrow drawings illustrating the stats in a clear way. The issue is that it’s not relevant to statistics and furthermore makes this impossible to recommend for readers who are not progressive ideologically.
Chapter 10: Experimental design
5/10
Clear but boring. This chapter is an intro to the basics of experimental design. But this is an intro you get in any proper academic textbook at your university. And you need way more examples to understand all of this.
Chapter 11: Regression
5/10
Clear but boring. This is advanced regression analysis and even ANOVA outputs are shown so it’s too high a level for such a silly comic book. I did notice that the book became unbiased again in the last 2 chapters which I think is very nice.
Chapter 12: Conclusion
3/10
Extra math concept mentioned.
My final opinion on the book
Boring, biased, dry, old and colorless.
I don’t use stats for a job so it’s not really something I forced myself to memorize. By reading this book I just wanted to understand the basics and see if I could have fun with it. The right book can make even a dry topic fun for laymen. This is just not it. This is for math nerds getting A+ in math starting in a stats class and just wanting a fast refresher book to get going. They will recognize half the formulas, but still struggle with the rest. Unless you remember 20 stats formulas already this is just not for your level. It’s way too advanced.
Then the colorless pages, bad humor and bias didn’t really help. It’s definitely not a book you can blindly recommend to students unless they are left-wing politically.
Overall it’s just boring. That’s the main issue. I didn’t have fun reading any of it. Not even the “jokes” or drawn examples besides max 5 examples out of 100.
This is a book for people who work with stats already. So people who use formulas to work with big data and everything is explained from that point of view. I do want to understand stats. I just don’t need a detailed guide about producing them. What I really want is a book using academic papers as examples. This is where I see 95% of the advanced stats I want to understand better. So psychology papers with various tables and results. If a book just went over 10 such papers and explained all tables that would be perfect for me. I can’t find a single post, website, video or example of anyone doing that: going over how all results were calculated in academic papers. Of course this is the “loser” side of the equation.
I can’t really comment much on the math in the book as I didn’t go over it. If it has as many mistakes as the logical points, that's not good at all. I have read newer and more colorful stats books and recommend them instead. I used to work a bit with stats and read academic books to learn it. It was fun and many modern stats books are colorful and funny. But right now that’s not what I need.