(I wrote this for a class once, so might as well post it)
I always feel safe inside a Charles Simic poem. In a universe peopled by characters who shuffle about performing small acts of dying, who interact in ways that remind us of how soon they will be alone in the kitchen again, reheating hours-old tea, and of how abruptly a poem always ends, there is a pure conviction of voice. Simic places his reader in an environment which is morbid and at times violent, but somehow gives us the assurance that we’re going to make it to the other side of the poem safely.
Master of Disguises contains the poems I’ve come to associate with Simic: jarring, darkly unsettling, but in his deftly handled, inimitable way. Almost as jarring as their content, though, is that this is his twentieth collection of verse. Simic is prolific to the point of compulsion—constructing, deconstructing, reconstructing that terrible place I’ve come to love. I don’t believe I’m ever going to read that Simic poem I’ve been waiting for, the one in which a small girl, face and hands sticky with ice cream, reaches from her stroller to brush the narrator’s leg as her mother wheels her by. The narrator then finds himself in a small rural church where he says “despite it all, this life…this life…” and smiles to himself. Simic’s poems are too preoccupied with isolation and death to include moments in which the world redeems itself.
In Master of Disguises, we find the poems we expect, with titles like “Among the Exiles” and “Private Miseries.” They open with lines like “Grandma laughing on her deathbed” and “In his fear of solitude, he made us.” They end: “Then last night I thought of him / Sitting on a narrow bed / Breaking bread with his hands, / Unless, of course, he was dead.” Some critics say every poem is ultimately about death, and Simic’s relationship with death is complex. “Eyes Fastened With Pins” — from a previous collection, Charon’s Cosmology — was almost tender toward an overworked Death, suggesting a resignation on the author’s part. When Death lives a life of isolation, who are we to escape pain?
“Old Soldier” revisits this theme in the new book with more understatement by opening with the image of a child warrior:
By the time I was five,
I had fought in hundreds of battles,
Had killed thousands
And suffered many wounds
Only to rise and fight again.
The boy’s play-fighting is, of course, childlike, but it is perhaps, too, a reenactment of the trauma into which Simic himself was born: a world of bomb raids and “cinder-filled sky.” Yet, there is beauty in the boy’s world: cherry trees in bloom, for example. These moments do not find their way into the play-fighting of untraumatized children who don’t know the reality of war. In this poem, we meet a boy who does not imagine absolute ugliness; even in war, there are cherry trees. These moments speak to the child for whom violence and death are part of the natural landscape: alongside the cherry trees is a horse “hitched to a hearse, / Outside a pile of rubble, / Waiting with its head lowered / For them to finish loading the coffins.” Simic makes the unbearable bearable, often through understatement. In the hands of a lesser poet, a piece like “Old Soldier” might have become a clumsy piece of rhetoric. Simic reveals the story as a life lived, not as a life examined through politics.
This theme from “Old Soldier” reappears in the fifth section of the longer poem “The Invisible,” in which a blind man asks passersby to read the dice he casts:
He’d ask anyone
Whose steps he heard,
The mailman making his rounds,
The undertakers loading a coffin in their black wagon,
And you, too, mister,
Should you happen to come along.
Even the reader is made part of a narrative in which death wanders unknowingly, almost unnoticed, into the scene. Simic pushes further, though, embracing what seems to be a permeable membrane between this world and the other:
Don’t the shadows know something about it?
The way they, too, come and go
As if paying a visit to that other world
Where they do what they do
Before hurrying back to us.
There seems to be some inevitable reason for the movement between the two worlds. These shadows, busy with their unknowable tasks, recall the boy in “Old Soldier,” too immersed in plunging his sword into a swarm of flies to attend to the cat’s tail, which “needs pulling.” There is always purpose to the way we die in Simic’s poems. To his credit, he never offers an opinion as to what it might be. Simic gives a very abstract subject—the passage between terrestrial and spiritual life—solid footing through the image of the shadow. What, though, compels Simic to address this subject so frequently, and over such a wide span of decades?
Perhaps not enough has been made of the poet’s childhood in Yugoslavia during the second World War and its impact on him. Take Simic’s response to a question posed by Michael J. Vaughn:
I left Yugoslavia 54 years ago, have written about my childhood now and then, but rarely think about it any more. It wasn’t the culture that made an effect on me, but bombs falling on my head from 1941 to 1944, plus all the other nasty things that went on in occupied Belgrade.
The interviewer fails to follow up. Vaughn might have responded, “Others might argue that many of your poems seem to be about your childhood. Why do you disagree?” He might have asked Simic whether his childhood’s bombs found their way into poems he’s written about violence and “nasty things,” and why this is not, in fact, evidence of thinking about his childhood.
Perhaps Simic is loath to discuss those memories without the structure and control of poetry. It’s difficult to talk about something you have no control over, whether it’s the violence of the war-ravaged homeland or the inevitability of death. This is why the universe he has created throughout his career, this “terrible place,” seems so personal. This is why the reader can feel comfortable in the midst of great unease — because the author’s careful eye and voice is always present, never letting the angst grow unbearably great. Even though I’ve argued that his stories seem natural, they’ve clearly been painstakingly constructed. This is Simic’s great strength.
There are moments of weakness in this collection, too. “Scribbled in the Dark” is a series of fragmented images that begins with “A shout in the street” and ends with “Streams of blood in the gutter / Waiting for sunrise.” The nuance of his better poems is absent. The poem comes off as melodramatic, a list of images ripped from the pages of an overwrought neo-noir script.
Yet I’m willing to overlook the occasional misstep. To write even a single poem about pain or death in a way that both unsettles and eases the psyche is a feat of linguistic and emotional control. Master of Disguises builds on Simic’s legacy of style, which has refused to grow tiresome because his poems never claim to be a first telling. They are a retelling of some timeless unknowable truth into which we are all born.