167 books
—
162 voters
to-read
(1136)
currently-reading (5)
read (425)
did-not-finish (0)
philosophy (494)
psychology (347)
islam (238)
fiction (123)
science (116)
art (66)
gender (64)
classics (63)
currently-reading (5)
read (425)
did-not-finish (0)
philosophy (494)
psychology (347)
islam (238)
fiction (123)
science (116)
art (66)
gender (64)
classics (63)
recs-to-me
(56)
biographies (52)
religion-civilization (51)
sigmund-freud (47)
religion-history (42)
religion-politics (40)
world-order (35)
cg-jung (34)
neuro-related (32)
psychiatry (30)
gs (29)
karl-popper (27)
biographies (52)
religion-civilization (51)
sigmund-freud (47)
religion-history (42)
religion-politics (40)
world-order (35)
cg-jung (34)
neuro-related (32)
psychiatry (30)
gs (29)
karl-popper (27)
“The crowd, in fact, is composed of individuals; it must therefore be in every man's power to become what he is, an individual. From becoming an individual no one, no one at all, is excluded, except he who excludes himself by becoming a crowd. To become a crowd, to collect a crowd about one, is on the contrary to affirm the distinctions of human life. The most well-meaning person who talks about these distinctions can easily offend an individual. But then it is not the crowd which possesses power, influence, repute, and mastery over men, but it is the invidious distinctions of human life which despotically ignore the single individual as the weak and impotent, which in a temporal and worldly interest ignore the eternal truth- the single individual.”
―
―
“If science could comprehend all phenomena so that eventually in a thoroughly rational society human beings became as predictable as cogs in a machine, then man, driven by this need to know and assert his freedom, would rise up and smash the machine.
What the reformers of the Enlightenment, dreaming of a perfect organization of society, had overlooked, Dostoevski saw all too plainly with the novelist's eye: namely, that as modern society becomes more organized and hence more bureaucratized it piles up at its joints petty figures like that of the Underground Man, who beneath their nondescript surface are monsters of frustration and resentment.”
―
What the reformers of the Enlightenment, dreaming of a perfect organization of society, had overlooked, Dostoevski saw all too plainly with the novelist's eye: namely, that as modern society becomes more organized and hence more bureaucratized it piles up at its joints petty figures like that of the Underground Man, who beneath their nondescript surface are monsters of frustration and resentment.”
―
“I believe that we are henceforth incapable of returning to an order of moral life which would take the form of a simple submission to commandments or to an alien or supreme will, even if this will were represented as divine. We must accept as a positive good the critique of ethics and religion that has been undertaken by the school of suspicion. From it we have learned to understand that the commandment that gives death, not life, is a product and projection of our own weakness.”
― The Conflict of Interpretations
― The Conflict of Interpretations
“In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true. ... Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.”
― The Origins of Totalitarianism
― The Origins of Totalitarianism
Philosophy
— 5874 members
— last activity 11 hours, 12 min ago
What is Philosophy? Why is it important? How do you use it? This group looks at these questions and others: ethics, government, economics, skepticism, ...more
The Brain and Mind
— 4494 members
— last activity 4 hours, 48 min ago
This is a group for readers to recommend and discuss books related to real and/or artificial brains. Categories include but are not limited to: neuros ...more
Goodreads Librarians Group
— 326183 members
— last activity 0 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more
The Kindred Spirits
— 300 members
— last activity Sep 23, 2025 07:28AM
Place to meet and talk about anything.
LessWrong
— 590 members
— last activity Dec 18, 2016 12:38AM
Users of Less Wrong, a community blog dedicated to refining the art of human rationality.
Maica’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Maica’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Maica
Lists liked by Maica



































